Judgments
GAUTAM JAIN Vs. U.O.I.& ANR.
This provision commands communication of the grounds on which the order of detention has been passed and to afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order. In the instant case, the documents containing the statement of Pooran Chand Sharma were not given and for this very reason, the High Court rightly held that such a ground cannot be relied upon by the respondents in support Full Judgment
GOPAL AND SONS (HUF) Vs. CIT KOLKATA-XI
M/S PATEL BROTHERS Vs. STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.
VIJENDRA SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Vs. ABDUL ALI AND ORS.
Divisional Railway Manager Versus Public Utility Permanent Lok Adalat Oth.
PEPSU ROAD TPT CORPN, PATIALA Vs. AMANDEEP SINGH & ORS.
In view of the above, it is well settled that the notice inviting option need not to be personally served to the employees unless the Regulation or any instruction so provides. From the facts of the present case it is clear that although Regulations were in force from 1992, plaintiff retired on 30th November, 2011 and after retirement received CPF benefits without any protest and Full Judgment
KISHORE BHADKE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION Vs. HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORP.LTD&ORS
BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET Vs. CRICKET AASOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS. - 03/01/2017
JAIRAM S/O NATHU SALUNKE Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EPFO AND ANR. Vs. THE MANAGEMENT OF RSL TEXTILES INDIA PVT. LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. HARDWARI LAL RANA & ORS
Smt. Sadhna Agrawal, W/o Chhatradhari Agrawal Vs . State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.
Mintu Dubey. Vs. Union of India through SP, CBI Jabalpur.
Head Notes : It is the settled position of law that mere recovery of amount is not sufficient to convict a person under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act if the same is not backed by demand and acceptance of bribe as an illegal gratification. The proof of demand of illegal gratification, thus, is the gravamen of the offence under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) & (ii) of the Act and in absence thereof, unmistakably the charge therefor, would fail. Mere acceptance Full Judgment