Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5212-5220
of 2007, Judgment Date: Nov 18, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 798
of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 18, 2015
“....Whether sanction is to be accorded or not, is a matter for the
Government to consider. The absolute power to accord or withhold sanction
on the Government is irrelevant and foreign to the duty cast on that Court
which is the ascertainment of the true nature of the act.”
“It is clear that the first part of Section 197(1) provides a special
protection, inter Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 13407
of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 17, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Writ Petition (Civil), 933
of 2014, Judgment Date: Nov 17, 2015
A public servant in a democracy should be a guardian of morals. He
is entrusted with higher responsibilities of a public office and they
contribute their best for the just and humane society. We feel that for
effective functioning of a democracy, the role of Executive is very
important. Civil servants and public officials are expected Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 13448
of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 17, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 9190-9191
of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 13368
of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 06, 2015
In our view, if a candidate has done B.Sc. in Forestry as one of the
major subjects and has also done Masters in the Forestry, i.e.,
M.Sc.(Forestry) then in the absence of any clarification on such issue, the
candidate possessing such higher qualification has to be held to possess
the required qualification to apply for the post. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 9187
of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 06, 2015
Misconduct, as has
been laid down, does not always have a moral connotation. To elaborate, it
may not have any connection with the individual/personal conduct of the
arbitrator. The said conduct would be in sphere of moral misconduct. As
far as legal misconduct is concerned, as the authorities would demonstrate,
the same must be manifest or palpable from the proceedings before the
arbitrator. To Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5102
of 2006, Judgment Date: Nov 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 375
of 2007, Judgment Date: Nov 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3518
of 2007, Judgment Date: Nov 05, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 514
of 2008, Judgment Date: Nov 05, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 430
of 2007, Judgment Date: Nov 04, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4664
of 2006, Judgment Date: Nov 04, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 126
of 2010, Judgment Date: Nov 04, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 167
of 2006, Judgment Date: Nov 04, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 13361
of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 04, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 13353
of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 04, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 7607
of 2005, Judgment Date: Nov 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4493
of 2006, Judgment Date: Nov 03, 2015
Full Judgment
