Judgments - Acquittal
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs BASAVRAJ SIDRAMAPPA KANDALGAONKAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs VASANT RAMESHWAR MITKARI & ORS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs VASANT RAMESHWAR MITKARI & ORS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs AVINASH VITTHAL DHARWADKAR
U.K.DAS,DY.DIRECTOR [SAFETY] Vs ARDESHIR BOMANJI A.DUBASH & ORS
STATE OF U.P. Vs. SUNIL
Shailendra Chaudhary Vs. Smt. Seema Singh And Anr.
KRISHNEGOWDA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ARKALGUD POLICE
It is settled law that mere latches on the part of Investigating Officer itself cannot be a ground for acquitting the accused. If that is the basis, then every criminal case will depend upon the will and design of the Investigating Officer. The Courts have to independently deal with the case and should arrive at a just conclusion beyond reasonable doubt basing on the evidence on record. Once there is Full Judgment
HAKEEM KHAN & ORS. Vs. STATE OF M.P.
It will be necessary for us to emphasise that a possible view denotes an opinion which can exist or be formed irrespective of the correctness or otherwise of such an opinion. A view taken by a court lower in the hierarchical structure may be termed as erroneous or wrong by a superior court upon a mere disagreement. But such a conclusion of the higher Full Judgment
RAJ KUMAR @ RAJU Vs. STATE(NCT OF DELHI)
The chain leading to the sole conclusion that it is the accused persons and nobody else who had committed the crime is not established by the three circumstances set forth above, even if all of such circumstances are assumed to be proved against the accused. Reliance has also been placed on the decision of this Court in the case of Sanwat Khan and Anr. vs. State Full Judgment
MD. SAJJAD @ RAJU @ SALIM Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
The identification parade itself was held 25 days after the arrest. Their chance meeting was also in the night without there being any special occasion for them to notice the features of any of the accused which would then register in their minds so as to enable them to identify them on a future date. The chance meeting was also for few Full Judgment
AJAY SINGH AND ANR AND ETC. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANR
Performance of judicial duty in the manner prescribed by law is fundamental to the concept of rule of law in a democratic State. It has been quite often said and, rightly so, that the judiciary is the protector and preserver of rule of law. Effective functioning of the said sacrosanct duty has been entrusted to the judiciary and that entrustment expects the courts to conduct Full Judgment
H.D. SIKAND (D) TH:LRS. Vs. C.B.I.& ANR.
GURCHARAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
There is thus neither any proximate nor remote acts of omission or commission on the part of the appellant and his family members that can be irrefutably construed to be a direct or indirect cause or factor compelling Surjit and her daughters to take the extreme step of self-elimination. It is thus manifest that the offence punishable is one of abetment of the commission of suicide by any person, predicating existence of a Full Judgment
GURPAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
Further, having regard to the root cause of the incident and the events that sequentially unfolded thereafter, we are of the comprehension that the appellant was overpowered by an uncontrollable fit of anger somuch so that he was deprived of his power of self-control and being drawn in a web of action reflexes, fired at the deceased and the injured, who were within his sight. The facts do not commend to Full Judgment