Judgments - Appeal
Chingu @ Sohanlal and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ramadhar @ Daddi Kachhi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (I) If, in presence of the accused at his house something wrong has happened with his wife, then in view of Section 106 of the Evidence Act, he is under burden to give a cogent explanation as to how the crime was committed. (II) Conviction can be based on circumstantial evidence. Full Judgment
Guddu & Durga Shankar Yadav & others Vs. The State of M.P.
Law laid down - To substantiate a charge under Section 302 with the aid of Section 34, it must be shown that the criminal act complained against was done by one of the accused persons in furtherance of the common intention of the both. Common intention has to be distinguished from same or similar intention. Full Judgment
Manoj @ Bablu Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Jaswinder Singh and another Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Baiju @ Vijay Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Shiv Narayan and others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (i) Even after acquittal of the charge under section 302 read with section 149 IPC, the remaining accused can be convicted under section 302 IPC without there being separate charge u/s 302 IPC. The same is a curable irregularity. (ii) To claim the right of self defence, there must be real danger to life or grievous hurt. Full Judgment
Alok Sharma Vs. Smt. Nisha Chaubey
Prasanna Kumar and another Versus State of M.P.
Law laid down - None explanation of injuries to the accused or to the deceased with a particular weapon is not always fatal, if there is specific ocular evidence. Section 149 of IPC makes every member of an unlawful assembly at the time of committing the offence guilty of that offence on the principle of constructive liability. In the case of inconsistency between medical evidence and ocular evidence priority has to be given to ocular evidence ignoring the minor discrepancies. Full Judgment
C. Venkata Swamy VERSUS H.N. Shivanna(D) by L.R. & Anr. Etc.
Raj Balam Prasad & Ors. VERSUS State of Bihar & Ors.
Union of India Versus Vijay Krishna Uniyal (D) through L.Rs.
Leela Bai Vs. Manorama Bai
Law laid down - The first appellate court while reversing the finding of the trial Court must record its finding in clear terms and explain how the reasonings of the trial Court are erroneous. Full Judgment