Judgments - Appointment
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JODHPUR VERSUS AKASHDEEP MORYA & ANR.
Swaran Vibha Pandey Versus State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - A Rules in nature of administrative instructions without any statutory force, cannot be said to be enforced by maintaining a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Administrative action - Executive Instructions, if are in conflict with statutory provisions, the later will prevail. But in absence of any conflict, both will prevail. Any departmental letter or executive instruction cannot prevail over statutory rule and constitutional provisions. Full Judgment
The Director of Treasuries in Karnataka & Anr. Versus V. Somyashree
Shailesh Kumar Sonwane Vs. State of M.P. and others
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF BHALGORA AREA (NOW KUSTORE AREA) OF M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD. VERSUS WORKMEN BEING REPRESENTED BY JANTA MAZDOOR SANGH
ANURAG SHARMA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR
KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION VERSUS K.N. RADHAMANI & ORS. ETC.
SOMESH THAPLIYAL & ANR. ETC. VERSUS VICE CHANCELLOR, H.N.B. GARHWAL UNIVERSITY & ANR.
ANAND SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
RAMKANWAR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE VERSUS RAJ KUMAR
PANKAJ KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
PRAVEEN KUMAR C.P. VERSUS KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION COMMISSION & ORS.
Prem Narayan Singh and Ors. Versus Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Amar Dev Pandey Vs. The State of Bihar
Arun Singh Chouhan Vs. State of MP & Ors.
Law laid down - Article 226 of the Constitution – Writ of Quo Warranto - Can be issued to test the validity of appointment to a public office. The said writ cannot be issued to examine the posting or working of an officer to particular place. Writ of Quo Warranto – Necessary party - The person against whom writ is prayed for is a necessary party. Public Interest Litigation – Conduct of petitioner - A practising Advocate has chosen not to answer the Full Judgment