Judgments - Appointment
SANJAY K. DIXIT AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS
Smt. Swati Upadhyaya Bharti Vs. State of M.P. & others
Union of India & Ors Versus Md. Samim Azad
HIGH COURT OF HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL ETC VERSUS P. MURALI MOHANA REDDY AND ORS. ETC.
RAKESH BAKSHI & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS
V. SURENDRA MOHAN VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS
Smt. Aarti Parihar Vs Smt. Sunita and Others
KU. BHAWANA VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
Shri Kant And 5 Ors. Vs. State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Basic Education & Ors
Ram Biloki and another Vs. Ramswaroop and others
Vivek Mudgil Versus State of U.P. & Ors
ZAHOOR AHMAD RATHER AND ORS ETC VERSUS SHEIKH IMTIYAZ AHMAD AND ORS ETC
Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Versus Surendra Kumar & Ors
Ku. Surabhi Baghel Versus High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
Law laid down - Scope of interference – In academic matters in framing of questions, evaluation of answers and finalisation of model answers – the Court cannot and should not act as Court of appeal, but to leave the same to academicians and experts. Full Judgment
U.P. JAL NIGAM & ORS :Versus: AJIT SINGH PATEL & ORS
Hemant Bakolia Vs. State of MP & Ors.
Law laid down - Rounding off of the marks is not permissible contrary to the expressed language of the Rule containing the mandatory condition of obtaining atleast 50% marks in each paper. In a competitive examination each fraction of marks has a bearing on the result of the participating candidate and if in such a case rounding off of marks is allowed that will defeat the very principle of assessing comparative merit. No revaluation of answer sheet can be directed in the absence of any Full Judgment