Filter by Date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Madhur Vs. State of M.P.

WRIT PETITION, 21231 of 2017, Judgment Date: Apr 17, 2018

Law laid down - (1) The word ‘suitable’ does not require a definition because any man of experience would know who is suitable. However, each case has to be viewed in the context in which the word ‘suitability’ or ‘suitable’ is used i.e. the object of the enactment & the purpose sought to be achieved. (2) ‘Eligibility’ is a matter of fact whereas ‘suitability’ is a matter of opinion. (3) M.P. Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1961- when Competent Authority has Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Ms. Reena Khedekar Vs. State of M. P. and Others

WRIT PETITION, 20120 of 2017, Judgment Date: Apr 16, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. VERSUS UTILITY USERS’ WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 14697 of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

AVINASH C. & ORS. VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3543-3555 of 2018, Judgment Date: Apr 04, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Dr. Divya Darshan Sharma and others

WA, 345 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 23, 2018

Law Laid Down - In absence of any definition being provided in the Statute or any statutory rule or instructions supplementing the Khel Sansthaon Evam Khiladiyon Ko Arthik Sahayata, Khel Vritti, Sammannidhi Niyam, 2006 as to what is “representation in the National games or recognized Senior National championship”, the meaning has to be assigned what is understood by a common citizen. The participation in the Zonal or the Inter-university competitions cannot be treated to be a representation in the National level games or Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. :Versus: RAGHUWAR PAL SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 1636 of 2012, Judgment Date: Mar 13, 2018

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Laxminarayan Agrawal Versus Smt. Kalpana Pandey

CRMP->CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION, 1412 of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 07, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Mukesh Kumar Umar & Another Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others

WRIT PETITION, 2377 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 07, 2018

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Bagherwal Versus Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu

Writ Petition (S), 2606 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 16, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Yogesh Mahajan Versus Prof. R.C. Deka, Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Special Leave Petition (Civil), 22475-22476 of 2012, Judgment Date: Jan 31, 2018

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SHRI BAIDYA NATH YADAV & ORS. Vs. GURU TEGH BAHADUR POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & ANR.

W.P.(C), 745 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 27, 2018

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SH. HARI KISHORE SHARMA Vs. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

W.P.(C), 11098 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 27, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Sunita Singh Versus State of Uttar Pradesh and others

Appeal (Civil), 487 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 19, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Ashutosh Pawar Vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh & Another

WRIT PETITION, 5865 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 12, 2018

Law Laid Down - * Decision of Criminal Court on the basis of compromise or an acquittal cannot be treated that the candidate possesses good character, which may make him eligible, as the criminal proceedings are with the view to find culpability of commission of offence whereas the appointment to the civil post is in view of his suitability to the post. The test for each of them is based upon different parameters and therefore, acquittal in a criminal case is Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

M/s Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited Vs. Northern Coal Field Limited

Arbitration Case, 56 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2018

Law Laid Down - * Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 deals with the appointment of Arbitrator without the intervention of the Court whereas appointment with the intervention of the Court is contemplated under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act. * The limitation for filing a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act is contemplated by the Limitation Act particularly Article 137 of the Schedule-I of the Limitation Act, 1963. The limitation does not start from the notice but Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND ORS. Versus PRADEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHER

Appeal (Civil), 67 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Caparo Engineering India Ltd Vs. Pradhanmantri Engineering Shramik Sanghthan

WRIT PETITION, 2928 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 02, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Committee of Management Versus The Director of Higher Education & Ors

Appeal (Civil), 917-918 of 2010, Judgment Date: Dec 05, 2017

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PRADEEP KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

W.P.(C), 9701 of 2017, Judgment Date: Dec 01, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Common Cause Versus Union of India and Others

Writ Petition (Civil), 1088 of 2017, Judgment Date: Nov 28, 2017

Full Judgment