Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CANARA BANK & ANR. Vs. M. MAHESH KUMAR

Appeal (Civil), 260 of 2008, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Common question of law falling for consideration in these civil appeals is whether the dependant family members of the deceased employee of the appellant-Canara Bank were entitled to seek compassionate appointment on the basis of ‘Dying in Harness Scheme’ which was passed Vide Circular No.154/1993 w.e.f. 8.05.1993. (i) Compassionate employment cannot be made in the absence of rules or regulations issued by the Government or a public authority. The request Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Raeesul Hasan Vs. State Of U.P.Through Secy.Education And 5 Ors.

WRIT - A, 1593 of 2001, Judgment Date: May 14, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HC PRADEEP KUMAR RAI & ORS. Vs. DINESH KUMAR PANDEY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6549 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.RADHIKA Vs. T.RAJYA LAXMI & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4201 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

It consists of innumerable errors. We only hope that it is not the desire of the High Court that such candidates are required to be appointed merely because they have the higher grade qualification. We, therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the judgment under appeal. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KHUB RAM Vs. DALBIR SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2734 of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2015

  Mr. Patwalia has rightly placed reliance to support the aforesaid submissions, on a judgment of this Court in the case of Meghmala v. G. Narasimha Reddy (2010) 8 SCC 383. The law relating to effect of fraud upon a competent authority to get an appointment/office as well as effect of fraud upon court has been discussed in detail in paragraphs 28 to 36 Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Ashish Kumar Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh & ors

WPS->WRIT PETITON SERVICE MATTER, 1182 of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 08, 2015

The issue with which this Court is required to deal is whether nondisclosure of registration of a criminal case, in which the petitioner has already been acquitted would make him eligible for remaining in employment? 8. In the matter of Devendra Kumar Vs. State of Uttaranchan And Others1, the Supreme Court has held that issue of obtaining appointment by misrepresentation is no more res integra. The question is not whether the applicant is suitable for the post. Pendency of criminal Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UMRALA GRAM PANCHAYAT Vs. THE SEC.MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE UNION & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 3209-3210 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 27, 2015

They have also been working for similar number of hours, however, the discrepancy in the payment of wages/salary between the permanent and the non-permanent workmen is alarming and the same has to be construed as being an unfair labour practice as defined under Section 2(ra) of the ID Act r/w Entry No.10 of the Fifth Schedule to the ID Act, which is prohibited under Section 25(T) of the ID Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

T.NADU TERMD.FULL TIME TEM.LIC EMP.ASSN. Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORP.OF INDIA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6950 of 2009, Judgment Date: Mar 18, 2015

The concerned workmen are the members of the appellant-Associations, Federation of Employees Association, Workers Association and other concerned individual workmen who were working in the branches of the Corporation at various places in the country have raised the existing industrial dispute between the concerned workmen and the management of Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & OTHERS Vs. REVAT SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 2061 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 20, 2015

Fixing eligibility for a particular post or even for admission to a course falls within the exclusive domain of the legislature/executive and cannot be the subject-matter of judicial review, unless found to Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M. SURENDER REDDY Vs. GOVT. OF A.P. AND ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 5099 of 2006, Judgment Date: Feb 18, 2015

The questions that arise for determination in this case are: (a)whether G.O.Ms.124 dated 7th March, 2002 is retrospective in nature in order to make it applicable to the posts for which selection process has already started pursuant to 1999 advertisement, and (b) If the said G.O.Ms. is retrospective, whether it is required to review the entire select Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NAWAL KISHOR MISHRA & ORS. Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD &ORS

Appeal (Civil), 1956-1957 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 17, 2015

Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties, the questions that arise for consideration in these appeals are as under: Whether the appellants have the locus standi to challenge the appointments made by the High Court in the filling up of the unfilled vacancies of the reserved categories in the Direct Recruitment Posts by way of promotion of the 'in service candidates'? Whether the High Court could have validly adopted the Reservation Act of 1994 Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF M.P. & ORS. VERSUS PARVEZ KHAN

AA, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10613 OF 2014 Judgment Date: Dec 01, 2014

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of U.P & Ors. Vs.Ashok Kumar Nigam

Appeal (Civil), 9029 of 2012, Judgment Date: Dec 13, 2012

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

GRIDCO LIMITED & ANR. VERSUS SHRI SADANANDA DOLOI & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 11303 of 2011, Judgment Date: Dec 16, 2011

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Union Public Service Commission versus Gyan Prakash Srivastava

Appeal (Civil), 10178 of 2011, Judgment Date: Nov 30, 2011

Full Judgment