Judgments - Arbitration
Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. Versus Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited & Ors. Versus M/s Ajay Sales & Suppliers
M/s. Upadhyay Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and others. Vs. M/s. Prism Infra Projects and others.
Law laid down - Madhya Pradesh High Court is not Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, therefore, appeal under Section 37(2) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 will lie before Principal Court of original civil jurisdiction i.e. before District Judge or Additional District Judge. Full Judgment
VIVAAN SOLAR PVT. LTD. VERSUS NORTHERN CENTRAL RAILWAYS & ANR
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED (NZ) VERSUS CHANNEL VAS SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.
Rukmini Devi Vs. M/s Aryan Flavors (Registered Partnership Firm)
M.P. Road Development Corporation Vs. The Ministry of Road, Transport and Highways (MORT & H) and another
Law laid down:- The M.P. Road Development Corporation challenged the order passed by the Arbitral Tribunal on a dispute arising out of a concession agreement executed between the Corporation and the respondent-Department, whereby the application filed by the petitioner-MPRDC under Section 16 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 contending that the dispute falls within the definition of ‘works contract’ over which the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 would have exclusive jurisdiction and therefore, the Full Judgment
M/S SUISSE A LA MODE (P) (LTD) VERSUS M/S KAPOOR ENTERPRISES
MR.PAWAN KUMAR CHHABRA VERSUS M/S OM ENTERPRISES
M/S FOODWORLD VERSUS INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD.
M/S INDIA OFF SET PRINTERS PVT LTD & ANR VERSUS INTECH CAPITAL LTD
Ellora Paper Mills Limited Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down:- Application preferred u/s 14 read with Section 11 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking termination of the mandate of originally constituted Arbitral Tribunal and appointment of a new Arbitrator. The question requires answer is whether sub-section (5) of Section 12 of the Act of 1996 would apply to arbitration proceeding which had already commenced prior to introduction of the amendment by Act 3 of 2016 with effect from 23.10.2015. In other words, whether sub-section (5) Full Judgment