Judgments - Compassionate Appointment
Bholeram Raikwar Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Deepika Singh Versus South Eastern Coalfields Ltd.
Smt Kirti Sharma Versus Jawaharlal Nehru Agriculture University, Jabalpur
M. KENDRA DEVI VERSUS THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU
SK Nausad Rahaman & Ors. Versus Union of India and Ors.
MUKESH KUMAR & ANR VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (PRIMARY) Versus BHEEMESH ALIAS BHEEMAPPA
Union of India & Ors. Versus Amrita Sinha
Manager (ER) & others Versus Smt. Preeti Singh
Rajendra Kumar Raikwar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - 1. Compassionate employment is not an alternate method of public employment but the same is given solely on humanitarian grounds with the sole object to provide immediate relief to the employee’s family to tide over the sudden financial crisis and the same cannot be claimed as a matter of right. 2. Compassionate appointment cannot be claimed as a matter of right as it is not a vested right and the policy prevailing at the time of death, would Full Judgment
Steel Authority of India Limited Versus Gouri Devi
The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. Versus Ashish Awasthi
Anil Kumar Singh Vs. South Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd. and Ors
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. VERSUS PREMLATA
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. VERSUS ARBIND JEE
THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOMMUNICATION, BSNL & ORS. VERSUS VIDYA PRASAD
The Director of Treasuries in Karnataka & Anr. Versus V. Somyashree
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. VERSUS UTTAM SINGH
Ravi Shanker Chouksey Vs. The State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - Writ of quo warranto can be issued to control executive action in making appointment to public offices. Public office must be office in which public is interested and of substantive importance and character. Writ of quo warranto cannot be issued for employees holding Class III and Class IV position. Full Judgment