Judgments - Compensation
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. VERSUS NARESH KHANNA & ORS
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. VERSUS DHARAM PAL & ORS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
ZENITH DRUGS & ALLIED AGENCIES PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SHRI UDAY KRISHNA PAUL VERSUS M/S. NICHOLAS PIRAMAL INDIA LTD
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
FAYAZ KHAN VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Tags Compensation
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. VERSUS PIYUSH KUMBNANI & ORS
Tags Compensation
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Rupa Roy VERSUS The New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
KIRAN BANERJEE & ORS VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY & ORS
Tags Compensation
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
PRAKASH CHAND VERSUS MOHD KAMIL & ORS (SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD)
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
RAJ KUMAR THAPA VERSUS AMIT ARORA & ORS
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
ANIL KUMAR @ ANIL SINGH VERSUS ARJUN SINGH AND ORS
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
ARUNA SWAKAR & ORS VERSUS HEMANT KUMAR & ORS (M/S IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD)
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. VERSUS VIMAL DEVI & ORS
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
SHRIRAM GIC INSURANCE CO. LTD. VERSUS KAMLA SHANKAR & ORS
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
GEETA RATHOR & ORS VERSUS THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL LAKRA & ORS VERSUS MONU KUMAR & ORS (ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD)
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURACE CO. LTD. VERSUS SANTOSH KUMAR & ORS
When half of the human body becomes disfunctional i.e. by debilitation of both the upper and lower limbs, it would significantly affect and reduce the functional ability of the said disabled person. In the circumstances, for the learned Tribunal to assess the functional disability to the extent of 60% is a fair assessment, in the facts of the present case Full Judgment
