Judgments - Compensation
ASGAR & ORS VERSUS MOHAN VARMA & ORS
Branch Manager Versus Smt. Manju Manjesh Rathore
LEELA BAI AND ANOTHER VERSUS SEEMA CHOUHAN AND ANOTHER
State of Uttarakhand & Anr VERSUS Raj Kumar
BADRI VISHAL PANDEY AND ORS VERSUS RAJESH MITTAL AND ORS
Vishnu Singhal Vs. State of M.P. and others
Vimla Devi & Ors. VERSUSNational Insurance CompanyLimited & Ors.
Employees Provident Fund Vs. M/s. Saraswati Ucchattar Madhyamik Vidhyala
Law Laid Down - The employees who avail the provident fund scheme under the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 fall within the definition of "Consumer" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as held by the Apex Court in Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Bhavani AIR 2008 SC 2957. Full Judgment
North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation VERSUS Smt. Sujatha
Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives Versus State of Karnataka & Ors.
SEBASTIANI LAKRA & ORS. VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR
Dr. Jeevan Yadav Vs. Swapnil & Anr.
Shivaraj :Versus: Rajendra & Anr.
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD VERSUS ASHALATA BHOWMIK AND ORS.
Anil Kumar VERSUS Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.
Gajanand S/o Chamru Lal @ Bhuria Lohar Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - An act of attempt to commit an offence is totally different from an act of preparation to commit an offence. There is no evidence that after laying down on the prosecutrix, the appellant in order to commit rape put his penis on the vagina of the prosecutrix or made any further attempt to penetrate in the vagina of the prosecutrix or touch any sensual organ with hand. Hence, the act which has been proved shows only preparation. Moreso, Full Judgment