Judgments - Constitutional Validity
Hindustan Construction Company Limited & Anr. Versus Union of India & Ors.
RAM KRISHAN GROVER AND OTHERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
M/S ADVANTAGES INDIA & ANR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited & Anr. Versus Union of India & Ors.
SHIV KUMAR VERSUS LT. GOVERNOR & ORS
Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India (FOGSI) Versus Union of India and others
Lunawat Construction Company, A Partnership Firm represented By its Partner Maniklal Peerchand Lunawat VERSUS Union of India & Anr.
Praveen Chand Shrivastava Versus State of Chhattisgarh
DHARANI SUGARS AND CHEMICALS LTD VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
RAJKUMAR SAHU Vs STATE OF M.P AND OTHERS
RAJDEEP GHOSH VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM & ORS.
JAYANT VERMA & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
M/S ATV PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
LOK PRAHARI THR.ITS GNRL.SECY,S.N.SHUKLA Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND ORS.
NABAM REBIA AND ETC. ETC. Vs. DEPUTY SPEAKER AND ORS.- Power of Governor
137. As is evident from our constitutional history, there are three areas in which a Governor might function: Areas in which he can act only on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. This is in all areas of the executive functions of the State Government [Article 166]. Areas in which he can act in his discretion by or under the Constitution and in which he Full Judgment
C/M Abhay Nandan Inter College And Anr. Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Pooja Dwivedi Vs M.P. Public Service Commissioner Indor
WIPRO LTD. Vs. ASST. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS & ORS.
2) The subject matter of those writ petitions/writ appeals was the constitutional validity of proviso (II-i) of Rule 9(2) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the "Valuation Rules"). 36) We are, therefore, of the opinion that impugned amendment, namely, proviso Full Judgment
SHREYA SINGHAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
This batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises very important and far-reaching questions relatable primarily to the fundamental right of free speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The immediate cause for concern in these petitions is Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000. 119. Full Judgment
VIVEK RAI & ANR. Vs. HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND THR.REG.GEN & OR
This writ petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking to declare Rule 159 of the High Court of Jharkhand Rules, 2001 as violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution and provisions of Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.").- It Full Judgment