Judgments - Consumer
M/s Anjaneya Jewellery VERSUS New India Assurance Co.Ltd. & Ors.
DLF HOMES PANCHKULA (P) LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. SHIV KUMAR VS. SUSHILA DEVI AND ANR.
M/S. TATA MOTORS LTD. versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (SPL) & ANR.
Naresh Rawat and Others vs. State of MP & Others
M/s. Supertech Ltd. Versus Rajni Goyal
Dr. S.K. Jhunjhunwala VERSUS Mrs. Dhanwanti Kumar & Anr.
Meenakshi Saxena & Anr. Versus ECGC Ltd. (Formerly known as Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd.) and Anr.
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ORS. VERSUSALL U.P. CONSUMER PROTECTION BAR ASSOCIATION
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR. Versus KURIEN E. KALATHIL AND ANR.
I.C. Sharma Versus The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
M/S ANKUR SEEDS P. LTD. THR. MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER Vs ARVIND S/O VITHOBA SAWAI
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. Vs. HINDUSTAN SAFETY GLASS WORKS LTD
When a claim is made by the insured that itself is actionable. There is no question of requiring the insured to approach a court of law for adjudication of the claim. This would amount to the encouraging avoidable litigation which certainly cannot be the intention of the insurance policies and is in any case not in public interest. In our opinion, in a dispute concerning a consumer, it is necessary for the courts to take a Full Judgment
PRATIBHA PRATISTHAN & ORS. Vs. MANAGER, CANARA BANK & ORS.
In these appeals a very short question has arisen, namely, whether a complaint can be filed by a Trust under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, ‘the Act’). The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, ‘National Commission’) answered the question in the negative and we are in agreement with that view. On a plain and simple reading of all Full Judgment