Judgments - Cruelty
MRS.KAILASHBEN MAHENDRABHAI PATEL Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SOMNATH S/O ASHOK DAREKAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
HEERA LAL AND ANR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SUBHASH GOPAL JADHAV Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
KALYAN DEY CHOWDHURY Vs. RITA DEY CHOWDHURY NEE NANDY
Aaqil Jamil And 2 Others Vs. State Of U.P. And Another
SARADA PRASANNA DALAI Vs. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CRIME BRANCH, ODISHA AND ORS
Rakesh Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Vinod Kumar Sen Vs.Smt Shanti Devi and others
MOHD HASHIM Vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS
RAMESH AND ORS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
K.V. PRAKASH BABU Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BAIJNATH AND ORS Vs. STATE OF M P
(38) A cumulative consideration of the overall evidence on the facet of dowry, leaves us unconvinced about the truthfulness of the charge qua the accused persons. The prosecution in our estimate, has failed to prove this indispensable component of the two offences beyond reasonable doubt. The factum of unnatural death in the matrimonial home and that too within seven years of marriage therefore is thus ipso facto not sufficient to Full Judgment
NARENDRA Vs. K.MEENA
Fortunately for the Appellant, because of the noise and disturbance, even the neighbours of the Appellant rushed to help and the door of the bathroom was broken open and the Respondent was saved. Had she been successful in her attempt to commit suicide, then one can foresee the consequences and the plight of the Appellant because in that event the Appellant would have Full Judgment
JOSE @ PAPPACHAN Vs. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOYILANDY & ANR
In Dhan Raj @ Dhand vs. State of Haryana (2014) 6 SCC 745, one of us (Hon. Ghose,J.) while dwelling on the imperatives of circumstantial evidence ruled that the same has to be of highest order to satisfy the test of proof in a criminal prosecution. It was underlined that such circumstantial evidence should establish a complete unbroken Full Judgment