Judgments - Death Sentence
PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
AKSHAY KUMAR SINGH VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
State Of Chhattisgarh Versus Shankar Haldhar
The third Judge to whom Criminal Appeal is referred upon difference of opinion amongst two Judges of the Division Bench is entitled to hear and decide the matter afresh. The third Judge is not bound to follow one or the other judgment rendered by the Judges of the Division Bench. Full Judgment
Ravi S/o Ashok Ghumare VERSUS The State of Maharashtra
Ravishankar @ Baba Vishwakarma VERSUS The State of Madhya Pradesh
Ishwari Lal Yadav Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Sudam @ Rahul Kaniram Jadhav VERSUS The State of Maharashtra
Kanhaiyalal Vs. State of M. P
Sachin Kumar Singhraha Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
DIGAMBER VAISHNAV & ANR VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Khushwinder Singh Versus State of Punjab
JAGDISH Versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Nand Kishore Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
RE: INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS
M.A. Antony @ Antappan Versus State of Kerala
CHHANNU LAL VERMA VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Touheed Musalman Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - It is not appropriate to award ‘death sentence’ in every case. To award death sentence, some factors are necessary to be considered, such as the age of culprit, manner of commission of offence and possibilities of reformation of accused, etc. Full Judgment
Asar Mohammad and Ors. :Versus: The State of U.P
Vinod alias Rahul Chouhtha - V/s - State of Madhya Pradesh P.S. Kotwali, Shahdol (M.P.)
Law Laid Down: The opinion of an expert is admissible in evidence u/S 293 of the CrPC and therefore, cannot be discarded on the basis of books on Medical Jurisprudence unless the passages which are sought to be discredited in the opinion of the expert are put to him - Judgments relied - AIR 1975 SC 905 (Phool Kumar vs. Delhi Administration) and AIR 1957 SC 589 (Bhagwan Das and another vs. State of Rajasthan). A DNA report must be accepted as scientifically Full Judgment