Judgments - Departmental Enquiry
V.M. SAUDAGAR (DEAD) VERSUS THE DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY
DURGA PRASAD VERSUS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
AMRESH SHRIVASTAVA VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ram Lal Versus State of Rajasthan
SANTOSH SONDHIA VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Versus Bharat Singh Jhala (Dead) Son of Shri Nathu Singh, through Legal Heirs & Anr.
Mahesh Singh Sikarwar Versus Union Of India
Ram Singh Gamad Versus The State Of M.P.
Pankaj Tiwari Versus Union of India
Keshav Dubey Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Jai Kumar Bajpai (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Smt. Chandrakanta Bajpai Versus Chairman-Cum-Managing Director
KALYAN DOMBIVALI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS SANJAY GAJANAN GHARAT AND ANOTHER
Alok Ranjan, Vs. The National Institute of Technology
SUNNY ABRAHAM VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Deenbandhu Saket Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others.
Law laid down - The delinquent employee in a disciplinary proceeding has a statutory right under Rule 18(4) of M.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966, to engage a Defence Assistant for which the Disciplinary Authority/Inquiry Officer ought to assist the delinquent employee so that the requirement of reasonable opportunity of being heard is satisfied. Full Judgment
Chief General Manager, S.E.C.L vs. Chandramani Tiwari
THE CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER VERSUS M.J. JAMES
Tarun Kumar Mishra Versus State of M.P. & Ors.
Law laid down - As per the provisions of Rule 14 of MP Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966, the disciplinary authority has to apply its mind separately at two different stages, (i) initiation of proceeding and (ii) approval of charge-sheet. It is not enough that if the disciplinary authority has formed an opinion to initiate the disciplinary proceeding and signed it, but for issuance of charge-sheet it would not be required to sign it by the disciplinary authority. Full Judgment