Judgments - Dowry Death
ASHOK Vs. STATE (GNCT OF DELHI)
BIBI PARWANA KHATOON @ PARWANA KHATOON AND ANR. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
SARADA PRASANNA DALAI Vs. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CRIME BRANCH, ODISHA AND ORS
Shiv Dhar and another Lal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
ANANDA BAPU PUNDE @ KOLI Vs. BALASAHEB ANNA KOLI & ORS.
AJAY SINGH AND ANR AND ETC. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANR
Performance of judicial duty in the manner prescribed by law is fundamental to the concept of rule of law in a democratic State. It has been quite often said and, rightly so, that the judiciary is the protector and preserver of rule of law. Effective functioning of the said sacrosanct duty has been entrusted to the judiciary and that entrustment expects the courts to conduct Full Judgment
Vinod Kumar Sen Vs.Smt Shanti Devi and others
BAIJNATH AND ORS Vs. STATE OF M P
(38) A cumulative consideration of the overall evidence on the facet of dowry, leaves us unconvinced about the truthfulness of the charge qua the accused persons. The prosecution in our estimate, has failed to prove this indispensable component of the two offences beyond reasonable doubt. The factum of unnatural death in the matrimonial home and that too within seven years of marriage therefore is thus ipso facto not sufficient to Full Judgment
JAMNADAS Vs. STATE OF M.P - Murder, Dowry Death, Cruelty.
SATISH SHETTY Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA. Dated - June 03, 2016
BALVEER SINGH AND ANR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. DATTARAJ & ORS.
Nand Lal V/s State Of U.P.
MAYA DEVI & ANR. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
Danish Vs State Of U.P.
BHANUBEN AND ANR Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
Merely because an accused has been held liable to be punished under Section 498A IPC, it does not follow that on the same evidence, he must also and necessarily be held guilty of having abetted the commission of suicide by the women concerned under 306 IPC. Therefore, the conviction and sentence for offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 114 of the Full Judgment
SUNIL KHERGADE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
V.K.MISHRA & ANR. Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.
Court cannot suo moto make use of statements to police not proved and ask question with reference to them which are inconsistent with the testimony of the witness in the court. The words in Section 162 Cr.P.C. “if duly proved” clearly show that the record of the statement of witnesses cannot be admitted in evidence straightway nor can be looked into but they Full Judgment