Judgments - Education
Pratush Kumar Sharma & ors Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors
COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT ANURAGI DEVI EGREE COLLEGE AND ANR. Vs. STATE OF U.P AND ANR.
M/S Fibremarx Papers Pvt Ltd.Thru Its Managing Director& Anr V/s State Of Up Thru.Prin.Secy.Deptt.Basic Education Lko.& 3 Ors
NIDHI KAIM Vs. STATE OF M P AND ORS ETC
ASSOCIATION OF MANAGEMENTS OF UNAIDED PRIVATE MEDICAL & DENTAL COLLEGE & ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. KALINGA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (KIMS) AND ORS.
Hind Institute Of Medical Science,Thru.Authorized Signatory V/s Union Of India Thru.Secy.,Ministry Of Health & Family Welfar
MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE & RES.CEN. & ORS. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
SANKALP CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
As per the said Notifications, a common entrance test, i.e., National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) shall be held. It was further submitted, interalia, as follows : “1. AIPMT 2016 to be held on 1st May, 2016 shall be phase I of NEET. 2. Phase II of NEET for the left out candidates shall be held on 24th July, 2016 by inviting applications with fee. 3. Combined result of Full Judgment
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. V.N. PUBLIC HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST & ORS
The application for grant of approval was filed with the Essentiality Certificate which was a conditional one and, therefore, a defective one. It was not an Essentiality Certificate in law. In such a situation, the High Court could not have directed for consideration of the application for the purpose of the inspection. Such a direction, we are disposed to think, runs counter to the law Full Judgment
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. JSS MEDICAL COLLEGE ANR.
KULDEEP KUMAR PATHAK Vs. STATE OF UP AND ORS
DR. JANET JEYAPAUL Vs. SRM UNIVERSITY AND ANR.
VNS COLLEGE OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.
Vatsal Gupta Thru His Father Vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Secondary Edu.Govt.Of Up & Ors.
SUNIL KUMAR & ETC. ETC. Vs. BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.
What was held, in our view, was that scaling is a method which was generally unsuitable to be adopted for evaluation of answer papers of subjects common to all candidates and that the application of the said method to the examination in question had resulted in unacceptable results. Holding of public examinations involving wide and Full Judgment