Judgments - Election
WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS Versus COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA (MARXIST) AND ORS
Shailesh Manubhai Parmar Versus Election Commission of India Through The Chief Election Commissioner & Ors.
SUMAN DEVI Versus MANISHA DEVI AND ORS
Balmukund Singh Gautam Vs. Smt. Neena Vikram Verma
Naushad Ali Versus Mubarak Ali @ Bhura
Law laid down - Revision against the order passed in an election petition under the M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961, Security deposit alongwith memo of Revision Petition under Rule 19(2) of Rules 1962 is mandatory. Security amount has to be deposited alongwith the revision petition. High Court has no discretion to condone the latches. Full Judgment
Pramod Laxman Gudadhe VERSUS Election Commission of India and Ors.
Prof. Chintamani Malviya Versus High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Mohammad Naushad Quereshi Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others
ABDULRASAKH versus K.P. MOHAMMED & ORS.
Sitaram Appellant (s) VERSUS Radhey Shyam Vishnav & Ors.
Bharati Reddy :Versus: The State of Karnataka & Ors.
Sureshchandra Bhandari Versus Smt. Neena Vikram Verma & Ors
Ajay Kumar Dohar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - The removal or disqualification of an elected representative has serious repercussion, therefore, elected representative must not be removed unless a clear-cut case is made out. The requirement of furnishing of election expenses is a step to ensure proper maintenance of accounts. Such condition is only a procedure to achieve the said object, thus, not a mandatory condition. The technicality of non-opening of bank account for incurring the election expenses through the bank account cannot be a ground to Full Judgment