Judgments - Fraud

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. V.L.S. FINANCE LTD. Vs. S.P. GUPTA AND ANR

Appeal (Crl.), 99 of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 05, 2016

Full Judgment

Tags Forgery And Cheating Fraud

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

KALI CHARAN Vs CANARA BANK & ORS.

W.P.(C), 8619,18726 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Fraud

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KHUB RAM Vs. DALBIR SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2734 of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2015

Mr. Patwalia has rightly placed reliance to support the aforesaid submissions, on a judgment of this Court in the case of Meghmala v. G. Narasimha Reddy (2010) 8 SCC 383. The law relating to effect of fraud upon a competent authority to get an appointment/office as well as effect of fraud upon court has been discussed in detail in paragraphs 28 to 36 Full Judgment

Tags Appointment Compensation Fraud Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

TEESTA ATUL SETALVAD AND ANR. Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Appeal (Crl.), 338 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 19, 2015

the question that arises for consideration is whether liberty on the one hand and fair and effective investigation on the other, make out a case for extending the benefit under Section 438 CrPC. Needless to say "Liberty is to the collective body, what health is to every individual body. Without health, no pleasure can be tasted by man; without liberty, no happiness can be enjoyed by society. Having stated about the Full Judgment

Tags Anticipatory Bail Forgery And Cheating Arrest Fraud Bail Investigation

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KRISHNA HARE GAUR Vs. VINOD KUMAR TYAGI AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 1755 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 11, 2015

-When the appointment is made de hors the rules, the same is a nullity. In such an eventuality, the statutory bar like doctrine of res judicata is not attracted. -"From the above, it is evident that even in judicial proceedings, once a fraud is proved, all advantages gained by playing fraud can be taken away. In such an eventuality the questions of non-executing of the Full Judgment

Tags Res Judicata Fraud

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MADHUKAR SADBHA SHIVARKAR (D) BY LRS. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 1751 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 11, 2015

In our considered view, the orders impugned in the writ petitions which are affirmed by the High Court, are perfectly legal and valid and therefore, the same do not warrant interference by this Court in exercise of power of this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution, but on the other hand, the aforesaid orders of the State Government can also be traceable to executive power of Full Judgment

Tags Fraud Land And Disputes Writ Of Certiorari

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)