Judgments - Injunction
NEON LABORATORIES LTD. Vs. MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD. & ORS
BHAI SARABJIT SINGH @ DR SABI SABHARWAL Vs SMT.INDU SABHARWAL & ORS.
Darshan Singh And 3 Ors. Vs Additional Commissioner (Judicial)
RAM KUMAR & ORS Vs THE ADMINISTRATOR OF UNION TERRITORY OF DELHI
Chandra Shekhar Shukla Vs Civil Judge (Senior Division) & 4 Others
Rakesh Kumar And Others Vs. Ashok Kumar And Anr.
Ajit Kumar Shanti Prakash Vs. Rajendra Bahadur & 10 Others
M/S MILLENNIUM WIRES P LTD Vs. STATE TRADING CORP. OF INDIA LTD & ORS
It would suffice to say here that injunctions against the negotiating banks for making payments to the beneficiary must be given cautiously as constant judicial interference in the normal practices of market can have disastrous consequences as it affects the trustworthiness of the Indian banks and markets. In the circumstances as narrated above and in light of the settled law on the point of injunction against the banks to honour their Full Judgment
JYOTI LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. BHARAT J. PATEL & OTHERS
The maintainability of a suit is question of law. Though, by virtue of declaration under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, all suits of civil nature are maintainable unless barred either by an express provision or by implication of law. We are of the opinion that the directions in paras 7.2 and 7.3 are inconsistent with the directions in para 7.4. Apart from Full Judgment
SHYAM LAL Vs. DEEPA DASS CHELA RAM CHELA GARIB DASS
The question that arises for consideration is as to whether the plaintiff-appellant became a trespasser after expiry of the lease period or continued to be a tenant having protection for eviction under the tenancy laws. Taking into consideration the various tenancy laws applicable in the State of Punjab and the law discussed by this Court and the High Court, in our considered opinion the trial court, the appellate court Full Judgment