Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

LOK PRAHARI THR.ITS GNRL.SECY,S.N.SHUKLA Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 11004 of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 21, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

STATE OF U.P. & ORS Vs. ALL U.P. CONSUMER PROTECTION BAR ASS.

Appeal (Civil), 2740 of 2007, Judgment Date: Nov 21, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench- Five Judge)

JINDAL STAINLESS LTD.& ANR. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3453 of 2002, Judgment Date: Nov 11, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench- Five Judge)

THE PUNJAB TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT ACT, 2004 - ADVISORY JURISDICTION

Special Reference Case, 1 of 2004, Judgment Date: Nov 10, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VOLUNTARY HEALTH ASS. OF PUNJAB Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Writ Petition (Civil), 349 of 2006, Judgment Date: Nov 08, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

T.S.DAS & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 2147 of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 27, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS Vs. JAGJIT SINGH AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 213 of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 26, 2016

Having traversed the legal parameters with reference to the application of the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’, in relation to temporary employees (daily-wage employees, ad-hoc appointees, employees appointed on casual basis, contractual employees and the like), the sole factor that requires our determination is, whether the concerned employees (before this Court), were rendering similar duties and responsibilities, as were Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HET RAM BENIWAL & ORS. Vs. RAGHUVEER SINGH & ORS

Appeal (Crl.), 463 of 2006, Judgment Date: Oct 21, 2016

It has been held by this Court that judges need not be protected and that they can take care of themselves. It is the right and interest of the public in the due administration of justice that have to be protected. See Asharam M. Jain v. A. T. Gupta, reported in (1983) 4 SCC 125. Vilification of judges would lead to the destruction of the system of administration of justice. The statements made by the Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. M/S. CIPLA LTD. & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 329 of 2005, Judgment Date: Oct 21, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Vs. M/S MEGHMANI ORGANICS LTD.& ORS

Appeal (Civil), 1679 of 2010, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S DUGAR TEA INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD. Vs. STATE OF ASSAM & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 2806 of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HIRAL P. HARSORA AND ORS. Vs. KUSUM NAROTTAMDAS HARSORA AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 10084 of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

GOV.BODY,L.P SHAHI COLLEGE, PATNA & ANR Vs. SEEMA MISHRA AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 10010 of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 05, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

TATTU LODHI @ PANCHAM LODHI Vs. STATE OF M.P

Appeal (Crl.), 292-293 of 2014, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

GOVINDASWAMY Vs. STATE OF KERALA

Appeal (Crl.), 1584-1585 of 2014, Judgment Date: Sep 15, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SUKHBIR SINGH & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 5811 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 09, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DHARIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs. KISHORE WADHWANI & ORS

Appeal (Crl.), 859 of 2016, Judgment Date: Sep 06, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

PRABHU CHAWLA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 842 of 2016, Judgment Date: Sep 05, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS(P) LTD. & ANR. Vs. ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8442-8443 of 2016, Judgment Date: Aug 31, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

ASHIQ HUSSAIN FAKTOO Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Writ Petition (Crl.), 46 of 2008, Judgment Date: Aug 30, 2016

The principle of ex debito justitiae is founded on a recognition of a debt that the justice delivery system owes to a litigant to correct an error in a judicial dispensation. Its application, by the very nature of things, cannot be made to depend on varying perceptions of legal omissions and commissions but such recognition of the debt which have the potential of opening new vistas of Full Judgment