Judgments - Interpretation
AVTAR SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
MUTHURAMALINGAM & ORS. Vs. STATE REP.BY INSP.OF POLICE
“Whether consecutive life sentences can be awarded to a convict on being found guilty of a series of murders for which he has been tried in a single trial?.” 17. The legal position is, thus, fairly well settled that imprisonment for life is a sentence for the remainder of the life of the offender unless of course the remaining sentence is commuted or remitted by the competent authority. That being Full Judgment
BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET Vs. CRICKET AASOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS.
V. VASANTHAKUMAR Vs. H.C. BHATIA AND ORS
In view of cases pending in the Supreme Court of India on average for about 5 years, in the High Courts again for about 8 years, and anywhere between 5- 10 years in the Trial Courts on the average, would it not be part of the responsibility and duty of the Supreme Court of India to examine through a Constitution Bench, the issue of divesting the Supreme Court of about 80% of the pendency of Full Judgment
EXTRA JUDL.EXEC.VICTIM FAMILIES ASSN&ANR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOCHI Vs. TRANS ASIAN SHIPPING SERVICES (P) LTD.
M/S UMESH GOEL Vs. HIMACHAL PRADESH COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.
TARA SINGH AND ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. - NDPS
STAR SPORTS INDIA PVT LTD. Vs. PRASAR BHARTI & ORS.
MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE & RES.CEN. & ORS. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
R.B. Rai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
27. Thus, taking overall view of the matter, the existing provision relating to reservation, backlog vacancies, carryforward of backlog vacancies and the operation of roster, contained in the Rules of 2002 runs contrary to the constitutional provisions contained in clause (4A) and (4B) of Article 16 and Article 335 of the Constitution and the law predicated in M. Nagaraj (supra), are declared ultra vires and non-est in law. 28. Consequently, various promotions of SCs/STs category made on the basis of these Full Judgment
VERHOEVEN, MARIE-EMMANUELLE Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2. The principal question for consideration is whether there is a binding extradition treaty in terms of Section 2(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 between India and Chile. Our answer to this question is in the affirmative. 3. The subsidiary question, equally important, is assuming there is no binding extradition treaty between India and Chile, whether Full Judgment
ITC LIMITED GURGAON Vs. COMMR.OF I.T(TDS) DELHI
AXIS BANK Vs. SBS ORGANICS PVT. LTD & ANR.
Hindu Personal Law Board Through Asok Pande V/s Union of India through Cabinet Secretary, Government of India & Ors
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. V.N. PUBLIC HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST & ORS
The application for grant of approval was filed with the Essentiality Certificate which was a conditional one and, therefore, a defective one. It was not an Essentiality Certificate in law. In such a situation, the High Court could not have directed for consideration of the application for the purpose of the inspection. Such a direction, we are disposed to think, runs counter to the law Full Judgment
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE & ORS
COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Based on the interpretation placed by us on Section 4A(4) of the MMDR Act, and Rule 28 of the Mineral Concession Rules, we can draw the following conclusions. Firstly, unless an order is passed by the State Government declaring, that a mining lease has lapsed, the mining lease would be deemed to be subsisting, up to the date of expiry of the Full Judgment