Judgments - Matrimonial Disputes
RASHMI CHOPRA VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR
NUTAN GAUTAM VERSUS PRAKASH GAUTAM
Tabrez Khan @ Guddu & Ors VERSUS The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr
LAHARI SAKHAMURI VERSUS SOBHAN KODALI
SWAPNANJALI SANDEEP PATIL Versus SANDEEP ANANDA PATIL
Jitendra Singh Kaurav Vs Smt. Rajkumari Kaurav
Smt. Samiksha Jain vs. State of M.P.
Dr. Jeevan Yadav Vs. Swapnil & Anr.
RajKumar Raghuvanshi {Lakhera} Vs. Smt. Radha Lakhera & Anr.
Manju Kumari Singh @ Smt. Manju Singh VERSUS Avinash Kumar Singh
Referred Cases 1. Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli, 2. Sanghamitra Ghosh v. Kajal Kumar Ghosh, Full Judgment
MS NEETU SINGH Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
Ashutosh Mishra & Ors. v. State of M.P. & Anr.
Pradeep Jain Vs. Smt. Manjulata Jain Modi and another
Law laid down - "Whether the children of the first husband of the wife is entitled to get maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C." Held - No. Full Judgment
Smt. Baljeet Kaur Vs. Harjeet Singh
Law laid down - 1- Mandatory period as prescribed in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to 'the Act, 1955) is discretionary in nature and Court can consider if there is no possibility of the parties resuming cohabitation and there are chances of alternative rehabilitation. 2- The Court can view the medium of video conferencing for seeking divorce under Section 13-B of the Act, 1955 and can also permit genuine representation of the parties through close relations such as Full Judgment
Dr. Sandeep Nahta vs. Smt. Deepa alias Jaya Nahta
MEENAL BHARGAVA VERSUS NAVEEN SHARMA
Hemant Rawat Vs. Smt. Anubha Rawat
Law laid down - Husband has failed to establish any reasonable excuse for withdrawal from the society of wife. He is under obligation to live with his wife in his home and under his roof. Full Judgment
MUNSHIRAM VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. ETC.
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Kumar
Sandeep Jain vs. Mrs. Nivedita Jain
Law laid down - Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act- 1.In determining the amount of maintenance income/financial position of the wife’s parents or other relations is immaterial. 2. Merely because the wife is well qualified, no presumption can be drawn that:- (i) she is in a position to maintain herself. (ii) she is out of employment on her own volition (iii) If she is not in a job it is due to her inaction 3. No set formula can be laid for fixing the amount Full Judgment