Judgments - Murder
Laxmi alias Chhotelal Vs. State of M.P
Vijayh Singh @ Vijay Kumar Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Latesh @ Dadu Baburao Karlekar Versus The State of Maharashtra
LACHHMAN DASS VERSUS RESHAM CHAND KALER AND ANR
ISSAC @ KISHOR VERSUS RONALD CHERIYAN AND ORS.
ATUL THAKUR VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ETC.
Khemchand Kachhi Patel Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Admissibility of statement tendered by an accused to the police – Extra-judicial confession, admissibility of the evidence of statement under Section 6 of the Evidence Act, res gestae. Full Judgment
Shrawan vs. State of M.P.
Law Laid down - 1. The conviction can be based on the testimony of child witness. 2. Even if, the witness turned hostile, it would not affect the case, if there is other evidence on record to prove the prosecution case Full Judgment
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Versus RAJ KUMAR
State of M.P. Vs. Natwar and others
NARESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF DELHI
DALIP SINGH Vs. STATE
SHIVA @ UWAN & ORS. Vs. STATE
JOSEPH Versus THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
FIRASAT HUSSAIN Vs. STATE (GNCT OF DELHI)
Sheru @ Mahendra Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Prasanna Kumar and another Versus State of M.P.
Law laid down - None explanation of injuries to the accused or to the deceased with a particular weapon is not always fatal, if there is specific ocular evidence. Section 149 of IPC makes every member of an unlawful assembly at the time of committing the offence guilty of that offence on the principle of constructive liability. In the case of inconsistency between medical evidence and ocular evidence priority has to be given to ocular evidence ignoring the minor discrepancies. Full Judgment