Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2077
of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 15, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CRL.A., 549,581,856,1140
of 2012, Judgment Date: Oct 14, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 207
of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 09, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 341
of 2012, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1314
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
APPLICATION U/s 482, 29569
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1178
of 2008, Judgment Date: Sep 30, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.M.C., 2520
of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1246
of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 23, 2015
Simpliciter, it has been
observed that a careful scrutiny of the entire evidence has been made but
we find from the judgment that no such exercise has been done. Mere
statement in the judgment to that effect is not enough. Evidence is not
only required to be mentioned in the judgment but its evidentiary value has
to be assessed carefully. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1547
of 2011, Judgment Date: Sep 18, 2015
The prosecution story relies upon the ‘last seen together’ theory, which
resulted into the death of Ganesh. This Court has time and again laid down
the ingredients to be made out by the prosecution to prove the ‘last seen
together’ theory. The Court for the purpose of arriving at a finding as to
whether the said offence has been committed or not, may Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 951-952
of 2007, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2015
This Court has time and
again laid down the ingredients to be made out by the prosecution to
prove criminal conspiracy. It is now, however, well settled that a
conspiracy ordinarily is hatched in secrecy. The Court for the purpose
of arriving at a finding as to whether the said Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 413
of 2007, Judgment Date: Sep 04, 2015
Case of the prosecution is entirely based on the circumstantial evidence. In a case based on circumstantial evidence, settled law is that the circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is drawn should be fully proved and such circumstances must be conclusive in nature. Moreover, all the circumstances should be complete, forming a chain and there should be no gap left in the chain of evidence. Further, the proved circumstances must be consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1081-1083
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 21, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 824
of 2013, Judgment Date: Aug 21, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 1786-1787
of 2009, Judgment Date: Aug 18, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 4099-4100
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 18, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 812
of 2008, Judgment Date: Aug 13, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION, 17626,6897
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 10, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 7526
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 07, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CRIMINAL APPEAL, 1147
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 04, 2015
Full Judgment
