Judgments - Murder
NATHIYA Vs. STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE,VELLORE
YOGESH SINGH Vs. MAHABEER SINGH & ORS
HARBEER SINGH Vs. SHEESHPAL & ORS
KAMTA YADAV & ORS. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
BHAGWAN JAGANNATH MARKAD & ORS. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
JOSE @ PAPPACHAN Vs. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOYILANDY & ANR
In Dhan Raj @ Dhand vs. State of Haryana (2014) 6 SCC 745, one of us (Hon. Ghose,J.) while dwelling on the imperatives of circumstantial evidence ruled that the same has to be of highest order to satisfy the test of proof in a criminal prosecution. It was underlined that such circumstantial evidence should establish a complete unbroken Full Judgment
SADDIK @ LALO GULAM HUSSEIN SHAIKH & ORS Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
VIKAS YADAV Vs. STATE OF U.P AND ORS. ETC. ETC
SOMASUNDARAM @ SOMU Vs. STATE REP.BY DY.COMM.OF POLICE
…For the present, it may be sufficient to state that the gist of the offence of criminal conspiracy created under Section 120-A is a bare agreement to commit an offence. It has been made punishable under Section 120-B. The offence of abetment created under the second clause of Section 107 requires that there must be something more than a Full Judgment
DHAL SINGH DEWANGAN Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
TATTU LODHI @ PANCHAM LODHI Vs. STATE OF M.P
GOVINDASWAMY Vs. STATE OF KERALA
PANKAJ Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
KADMANIAN @ MANIKANDAN Vs. STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE
ASHIQ HUSSAIN FAKTOO Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The principle of ex debito justitiae is founded on a recognition of a debt that the justice delivery system owes to a litigant to correct an error in a judicial dispensation. Its application, by the very nature of things, cannot be made to depend on varying perceptions of legal omissions and commissions but such recognition of the debt which have the potential of opening new vistas of Full Judgment
State of Chhattisgarh Vs . Sunil @ Balikaran Sahu & Anr.
BRIJ LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Every accused is presumed to be innocent unless his guilt is proved. The presumption of innocence is a human right. Subject to the statutory exceptions, the said principle forms the basis of criminal jurisprudence in India. The nature of the offence, its seriousness and gravity has to be taken into consideration. The appellate court should bear in mind the presumption of innocence Full Judgment
KALA @ CHANDRAKALA Vs. STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE
The prosecution has not been able to complete the chain of circumstances so as to fasten the guilt and to prove the commission of offence by the appellant beyond periphery of doubt. The appellant is acquitted giving her the benefit of doubt. Full Judgment