Judgments - NDPS
Rana Singh Versus The State Of Bihar
JITENDER BHATI VERSUS NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
MOHIT AGGARWAL VERSUS NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
EDWIN EMEKA IGBOKWE VERSUS NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
Duryodhan Nag Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Union of India Versus Prateek Shukla
SHEETAL VERSUS THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
The State (GNCT of Delhi) Narcotics Control Bureau Versus Lokesh Chadha
MANOJ GUPTA VERSUS NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
MOKIBE MR LEEPILE MOSES @ PATRICK UMECHUKWU VERSUS NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
AHMED HASSAN MUHAMMED VERSUS THE CUSTOMS
Sanjay Kamkar @ Sanjay Kumar Versus The State of Bihar
HERRY @ IKWUNNAYA KIZITO IFEANYI VERSUS STATE
Sk. Sakkar @ Mannan VERSUS State of West Bengal
MOHD. SHAHID @ MOHD. SAHID VERSUS THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI
Raja Bhaiya Singh Vs State of MP
Law laid down - 1. The order dated 23.3.2020 of Supreme Court related to extension of time limit, was not applicable for filing the challan within 60 days or 90 days as prescribed under CrPC. 2. Order upon the application filed for default bail under section 167(2) of CrPC is not an interlocutory order because it decided the valuable right of default bail finally at that stage. Therefore, revision is tenable against the aforesaid order. 3. (i) Period for filing the challan will Full Judgment
Dheerendra Dwivedi @ Dheeru Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Order granting interim custody of vehicle under Section 451 or under Section 457(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure is interlocutory order and criminal revision is not maintainable against it. Full Judgment
Aruni Sahgal Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Order granting interim custody of vehicle under Section 451 or under Section 457(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure is interlocutory order and criminal revision is not maintainable against it. Full Judgment