Judgments - Practice and Procedure
PALANISAMY AND ORS Vs. K. DHANPALAN
The moot question is: whether the enquiry conducted by the Disciplinary Committee in the present case can be said to be a fair and proper enquiry? Since the allegations made against the appellants were serious and the finding of guilt recorded against them inevitably had civil consequences, it is cardinal that they should have been allowed to cross- examine Full Judgment
Smt. Mamta Rai Vs. State Of U.P. & 8 Others
Once it has been found that Indra Dev had no right over the property in question, obviously his heirs also had no right, based upon inheritence, to transfer the same. There is no error of jurisdiction or failure of justice in the matter, which may require any interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition fails and is dismissed. Full Judgment
VIVEK RAI & ANR. Vs. HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND THR.REG.GEN & OR
This writ petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking to declare Rule 159 of the High Court of Jharkhand Rules, 2001 as violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution and provisions of Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.").- It Full Judgment
- 1
- 2
- Next
- Last