Judgments - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings
Anil Kumar and Another vs. State of MP and Another
Ramsingh Yadav vs. State of MP & anr.
Ambrish & Another v/s State of M.P. & Another
Lalit Vs. State Of U.P. And Another
SANTOSH S/O ADINATH GHALAGE AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
G. RAVI VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.
Brijveer Singh And Another Vs. State Of U.P. And Another
Sadhuram Udhvani & Ors. Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Phoolwari Vs. State Of U.P. And Another
Vijay Bahadur Singh Vs. M.P. Pollution Control Board
VINEET KUMAR AND ORS Vs. STATE OF UP & ANR
Inherent power given to the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is with the purpose and object of advancement of justice. In case solemn process of Court is sought to be abused by a person with some oblique motive, the Court has to thwart the attempt at the very threshold. The Court cannot permit a prosecution to go on if Full Judgment
RAM KISHAN FAUJI Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
“The expression "civil proceeding" is not defined in the Constitution, nor in the General Clauses Act. The expression in our judgment covers all proceedings in which a party asserts the existence of a civil right conferred by the civil law or by statute, and claims relief for breach thereof.” “A criminal proceeding on the other hand is ordinarily Full Judgment
Sabir Hussain & Ors. v. State of M.P. & Anr.
Rakesh Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Managing Director Vs State Of M.P.
Thus, as the Marico Industries Limited, Mumbai has not been arraigned as an accused, therefore, the prosecution of the applicant in his official capacity is not permissible because he cannot be vicariously held liable for the offence committed by the Company unless and until, the Company which is a juristic entity is arraigned as an accused. Full Judgment
Mrs. Indu Batni and 1 ano. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. FATEHKARAN MEHDU
The scope of interference and exercise of jurisdiction under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. has been time and again explained by this Court. Further, the scope of interference under Section 397 Cr.P.C. at a stage, when charge had been framed, is also well settled. At the stage of framing of a charge, the court is concerned not with the proof of the allegation rather it has to focus on the material and Full Judgment
Amar Singh Vs Ramdayal
THE STATE OF TELANGANA Vs. HABIB ABDULLAH JEELANI & ORS.
The seminal issue that arises for consideration in this appeal, by special leave, is whether the High Court while refusing to exercise inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) to interfere in an application for quashment of the investigation, can restrain the investigating agency not to arrest the accused persons during the course of investigation. There Full Judgment