Judgments - Quashing of FIR
RAJESH EBRAHIMKUTTY MAJIDHABEEVI VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
GEO VARGHESE VERSUS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
Nikunj Shivhare Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
MUKHTIYAAR ALI & ORS VERSUS THE STATE NCT DELHI & ORS
ABID QURESHI VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR
SH. RAMAN KAPOOR VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
DR. MAHEEP KUMAR MEENA VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
SHRI CHAND VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Pankaj Karoriya Vs. The State of M.P. and others
Smt. Neha Jain and others Vs. State of M.P. and another
(1) Smt. Guddi Rawat (2) Virendra Rawat Versus State of MP
Law laid down - (1) As Section 306 of IPC makes abatement of commission of suicide punishable, therefore, for making a person liable for an offence punishable under Section 306 IPC, it is a duty of the prosecution to establish that such person has abated the commission of suicide and for the purpose of determining the act of the accused it is necessary to see that his act must fall in any of the 3 categories as enumerated under Section 107 of Full Judgment
PRAVEEN KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI & ANR
Dr. Pawan Tamrakar and another vs. M.P. Special Police Establishment & others
Law laid down - 1. Law relating to clubbing of FIRs - There can be no straightjacket formula for consolidating or clubbing the FIR and Courts are required to examine the facts of each case. A second FIR in respect of same offence or different offences committed in the course of same transaction is not permissible. The second FIR on the basis of receipt of information in respect of same cognizable offence or the same occurrence or incident giving rise one Full Judgment