Judgments - Quashing of FIR
Smt. Ruchi Gupta & anr Vs State of M.P. & anr
Rafiq Ahmedbhai Paliwala VERSUS The State of Gujarat & Ors
Ummed Singh and another Vs. State of M.P. and another
Smt. Manorama Bai and Others Vs State of M. P.
Chhabiram Tomar and others Vs State of Madhya Pradesh and another
Mayank Sharma & Ors. vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
NARAYAN MALHARI THORAT VERSUS VINAYAK DEORAO BHAGAT AND ANR
Rakesh Rathore & Another vs. State of MP & Anr
Somdatt Mishra Vs. The State of M.P. & Another
Law Laid down - 1- When a complainant is restrained by the public authority to commit any illegal act and with motive to overcome such situation, any complaint under section 354 of IPC or like nature has been filed against the public servant, then it is the duty of the Investigating Officer to investigate thoroughly and reach to the motive if any exist, for which the complaint has been filed against the public servant. 2- Harassment of the public servant on pretext Full Judgment
Anand Kumar Mohatta and Anr. Versus State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Department of Home and Anr
Taranjeet Singh Hora & Anr. Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - [1] After registration of the first FIR the subsequent FIR for offence committed in the course of same transaction or offence arising as a consequence of prior offence, is not permissible and the subsequent complaint in such cases applying the test of “sameness” and “consequence” can be treated as statement under Section 161(3) of the Cr.P.C. in the FIR already registered but if the subsequent complaint is in regard to same incident but filed as a counter Full Judgment
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Versus SAYYED HASSAN SAYYED SUBHAN & ORS.
Referred Cases 1, STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Versus SANJAY Full Judgment