Judgments - Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds
CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE VERSUS HC (GD) OM PRAKASH
M/s Zigitza Health Care Ltd. Versus Naresh Kumar Verma & Ors.
Dr. Hitendra Singh Yadav Versus The State of M.P.
Law Laid down :- M. P. Civil Services( Leave Rules) 1977 Rule 32 - The petitioner was a probationer and was not holding the post substantively. Even otherwise, if a probationer has rendered less than 5 years service, the competent authority was well within its power to decline study leave. Rule 42 of Leave Rules - As per sub rule 4 clause(ii), the petitioner’s prayer for study leave was rightly declined because he admittedly remained under suspension from 2014-2021 and did not render Full Judgment
The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Vs. Anuradha Devi and Ors
UNITED BANK OF INDIA VERSUS BISWANATH BHATTACHARJEE
Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited Versus Basil T K & Ors
Deepak Kalosia and another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
The Chief Personnel Officer & Ors. Versus A Nishanth George
Brijesh Chandra Dwivedi (Dead) Thr. LRs. Versus Sanya Sahayak and Ors.
Dr. Vijendra Dhanware & Another Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - Admission Rules – Definition of ‘in-service candidates’ also includes the Medical Officers working in District Hospital whether or not such Hospital is situated in difficult, remote or rural area. Thus, they are entitled to be considered as special entry under 30%. MCI Regulations – Regulation 9(8). This regulation is applicable to Diploma Course and not to Degree or Post Graduate Degree Course. No provision was brought to the notice of the Court to show that posting at remote, Full Judgment
THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. VERSUS THE REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND OTHERS
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Versus Bhagwan & Ors.
Union of India VERSUS Alapan Bandyopadhyay
The Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (RMGB) & Anr. Versus Ramesh Chandra Meena & Anr.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. VERSUS MANJU ARORA & ANR.
Ravinder Kumar Dhariwal & Anr. Versus The Union of India & Ors.
Rajesh Pravinchandra Rajyaguru Versus Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board and Ors.
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. VERSUS SRI DEO KUMAR RAI @ DEO KUMAR RAY
Deenbandhu Saket Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others.
Law laid down - The delinquent employee in a disciplinary proceeding has a statutory right under Rule 18(4) of M.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966, to engage a Defence Assistant for which the Disciplinary Authority/Inquiry Officer ought to assist the delinquent employee so that the requirement of reasonable opportunity of being heard is satisfied. Full Judgment