Judgments - Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds
The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Vs. Anuradha Devi and Ors
UNITED BANK OF INDIA VERSUS BISWANATH BHATTACHARJEE
Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited Versus Basil T K & Ors
Deepak Kalosia and another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
The Chief Personnel Officer & Ors. Versus A Nishanth George
Brijesh Chandra Dwivedi (Dead) Thr. LRs. Versus Sanya Sahayak and Ors.
Dr. Vijendra Dhanware & Another Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - Admission Rules – Definition of ‘in-service candidates’ also includes the Medical Officers working in District Hospital whether or not such Hospital is situated in difficult, remote or rural area. Thus, they are entitled to be considered as special entry under 30%. MCI Regulations – Regulation 9(8). This regulation is applicable to Diploma Course and not to Degree or Post Graduate Degree Course. No provision was brought to the notice of the Court to show that posting at remote, Full Judgment
THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. VERSUS THE REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND OTHERS
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Versus Bhagwan & Ors.
Union of India VERSUS Alapan Bandyopadhyay
The Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (RMGB) & Anr. Versus Ramesh Chandra Meena & Anr.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. VERSUS MANJU ARORA & ANR.
Ravinder Kumar Dhariwal & Anr. Versus The Union of India & Ors.
Rajesh Pravinchandra Rajyaguru Versus Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board and Ors.
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. VERSUS SRI DEO KUMAR RAI @ DEO KUMAR RAY
Deenbandhu Saket Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others.
Law laid down - The delinquent employee in a disciplinary proceeding has a statutory right under Rule 18(4) of M.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966, to engage a Defence Assistant for which the Disciplinary Authority/Inquiry Officer ought to assist the delinquent employee so that the requirement of reasonable opportunity of being heard is satisfied. Full Judgment
Dharmendra Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar
The Union of India Vs. Dr. Arvind Kumar
M.L. Mittal Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & another
Law laid down - Mere pendency of an appeal against the acquittal order of an employee does not confer any right upon the respondent/employer to withhold the retiral dues of the employee. Full Judgment