Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
WA, 478
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 12, 2021
Law Point -
Service Law-Clause 22 of the Contract - Deeming provision of termination on remaining absent for more than one month-The principles of natural justice must be read into the provision. The Clause-22 is interpreted by taking into account the similar provisions of standing orders etc.
Fair Play and Reasonableness -The procedure adopted by employer must be just fair and reasonable. Moreso when its impact is on the right of livelihood of a person.
Validity of order-Judicial Review -The validity of an order Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2320
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 7427
of 2011, Judgment Date: Jul 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
W.P.(C), 5449
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Patna High Court (Single Judge)
Civil Writ, 86
of 2019, Judgment Date: Jul 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Patna High Court (Single Judge)
Civil Writ, 188
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
W.P.(C), 9053
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jul 05, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Single Judge)
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, 16706
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 28, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
W.P.(C), 8902
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jun 24, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CONC, 1444
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jun 24, 2021
Law laid down:-
(i) Concept of award of back wages is based on the fundamental principle of compensating the workman for the period he remained unemployed owing to termination which was found to be unlawful at subsequent point of time. Thus, the back wages, if to be worked out based on wages, it would have been drawn by the workman till he actually reinstated;
(ii) Any contrary approach to back wages after reinstatement would be opposed to the principle of Public Policy Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPS->WRIT PETITON SERVICE MATTER, 2726
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 22, 2021
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPS->WRIT PETITON SERVICE MATTER, 1233
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jun 22, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
W.P.(C), 5453
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jun 21, 2021
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPS->WRIT PETITON SERVICE MATTER, 2653
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 21, 2021
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPS->WRIT PETITON SERVICE MATTER, 2062
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jun 21, 2021
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPS->WRIT PETITON SERVICE MATTER, 2706
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 21, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CM(M), 16529
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 18, 2021
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPS->WRIT PETITON SERVICE MATTER, 2495
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 17, 2021
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPS->WRIT PETITON SERVICE MATTER, 1142
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jun 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPS->WRIT PETITON SERVICE MATTER, 5209
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jun 15, 2021
Full Judgment
