Judgments - Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR Vs. R.K. ZALPURI AND ORS
JAGDISH LAL GAMBHIR Vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS.
Umesh Narain Pandey Vs State Of U.P. & 2 Others
SHRI RAM BAHADUR PANDEY AND ANR. Vs. SHRI RAM DHANI PRASAD, SECRETARY, BHOTIA JAN JATI SEWA SAMITI AND ANR.
RAJINDER KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ANR
But the question is, whether dismissal is the only option in such situations where an employee is found unfit for service. We have no doubt in our mind that indiscipline of any sort cannot be tolerated at all in a disciplined force. However, in the factual background of the appellant which we have referred to above, the disciplinary authority or at least the appellate authority, should have considered whether a punishment other than dismissal would have been Full Judgment
RAVINDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF M.P & ORS
KSH.LAKSHAHEB SINGH AND ORS Vs. STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS
U.V.MAHADKAR Vs. SUBHASH ANAND CHAVAN & ORS.
TAPAS KUMAR MONDAL AND ORS. ETC. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
GURDAS SINGH & ORS. ETC. Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
STATE OF M.P. Vs. MOHAN LAL
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. In view of the Order dated 15.09.2014 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal No. 9675 of 2014 titled as “State of M.P. & Anr. vs. Vinod Kumar Tiwari”, in our considered opinion, it is a fit case where some compensation should be awarded to the respondent instead of directing the appellant to reinstate Full Judgment
UOI & OTHERS Vs. NO. 3989606 P, EX-NK VIJAY KUMAR
DALJIT SINGH GREWAL Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS
DELHI JAL BOARD Vs INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL II & ORS.
MADRAS INST.OF DEV. STUDIES & ANR. Vs. K. SIVASUBRAMANIYAN & ORS.
SAROJ KUMAR Vs. U.O.I & ORS.
K.K.GOHIL Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
A.N. SACHDEVA (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. Vs. MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY,ROHTAK &ANR
Considering the principles enunciated under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, and that the benefit is not an ex gratia payment but a payment in recognition of past service, in our opinion, discrimination could not have been made between those employees who have been absorbed/allocated are entitled to count their services as qualifying service for the purpose of pension and not those who have been appointed directly. Fact remains that all these employees have served in Punjab University/Kurukshetra University/MD. University without any break. M.D. University, prior to Full Judgment