Judgments - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Mayank Shrivastava Vs Smt. Ritu Shrivastava
NUTAN GAUTAM VERSUS PRAKASH GAUTAM
Jitendra Singh Kaurav Vs Smt. Rajkumari Kaurav
Smt. Rakhi Shukla Vs. Manoj Shukla
RajKumar Raghuvanshi {Lakhera} Vs. Smt. Radha Lakhera & Anr.
MR. ANURAG MITTAL Versus MRS. SHAILY MISHRA MITTAL
Referred Cases - (1) LILA GUPTA Vs LAXMI NARAIN & ORS (2) SHIV PRASAD Vs. DURGA PRASAD & ANR Full Judgment
Manju Kumari Singh @ Smt. Manju Singh VERSUS Avinash Kumar Singh
Referred Cases 1. Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli, 2. Sanghamitra Ghosh v. Kajal Kumar Ghosh, Full Judgment
Mrs. Kanika Goel :Versus: State of Delhi through S.H.O. and Anr.
Referred Cases 1. JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD.), AND ANR 2, Surinder Kaur Sandhu Vs. Harbax Singh Sandhu and Anr 3, Aviral Mittal Vs. State 4, Shilpa Aggarwal Vs. Aviral Mittal and Anr. 5, Dr. V. Ravi Chandran Vs. Union of India & Ors. Full Judgment
Ashutosh Mishra & Ors. v. State of M.P. & Anr.
Smt. Baljeet Kaur Vs. Harjeet Singh
Law laid down - 1- Mandatory period as prescribed in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to 'the Act, 1955) is discretionary in nature and Court can consider if there is no possibility of the parties resuming cohabitation and there are chances of alternative rehabilitation. 2- The Court can view the medium of video conferencing for seeking divorce under Section 13-B of the Act, 1955 and can also permit genuine representation of the parties through close relations such as Full Judgment
Hemant Rawat Vs. Smt. Anubha Rawat
Law laid down - Husband has failed to establish any reasonable excuse for withdrawal from the society of wife. He is under obligation to live with his wife in his home and under his roof. Full Judgment
Sanjay Kumar Sinha VERSUS Asha Kumari & Anr.
Sandeep Jain vs. Mrs. Nivedita Jain
Law laid down - Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act- 1.In determining the amount of maintenance income/financial position of the wife’s parents or other relations is immaterial. 2. Merely because the wife is well qualified, no presumption can be drawn that:- (i) she is in a position to maintain herself. (ii) she is out of employment on her own volition (iii) If she is not in a job it is due to her inaction 3. No set formula can be laid for fixing the amount Full Judgment
ASHISH BHARTI Vs. MEETA SACHDEV
Referred Cases 1, Shri Bharat Hegde Vs. Smt.Saroj Hegde Full Judgment