Judgments - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
MR. ANURAG MITTAL Versus MRS. SHAILY MISHRA MITTAL
Referred Cases - (1) LILA GUPTA Vs LAXMI NARAIN & ORS (2) SHIV PRASAD Vs. DURGA PRASAD & ANR Full Judgment
Manju Kumari Singh @ Smt. Manju Singh VERSUS Avinash Kumar Singh
Referred Cases 1. Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli, 2. Sanghamitra Ghosh v. Kajal Kumar Ghosh, Full Judgment
Mrs. Kanika Goel :Versus: State of Delhi through S.H.O. and Anr.
Referred Cases 1. JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD.), AND ANR 2, Surinder Kaur Sandhu Vs. Harbax Singh Sandhu and Anr 3, Aviral Mittal Vs. State 4, Shilpa Aggarwal Vs. Aviral Mittal and Anr. 5, Dr. V. Ravi Chandran Vs. Union of India & Ors. Full Judgment
Ashutosh Mishra & Ors. v. State of M.P. & Anr.
Smt. Baljeet Kaur Vs. Harjeet Singh
Law laid down - 1- Mandatory period as prescribed in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to 'the Act, 1955) is discretionary in nature and Court can consider if there is no possibility of the parties resuming cohabitation and there are chances of alternative rehabilitation. 2- The Court can view the medium of video conferencing for seeking divorce under Section 13-B of the Act, 1955 and can also permit genuine representation of the parties through close relations such as Full Judgment
Hemant Rawat Vs. Smt. Anubha Rawat
Law laid down - Husband has failed to establish any reasonable excuse for withdrawal from the society of wife. He is under obligation to live with his wife in his home and under his roof. Full Judgment
Sanjay Kumar Sinha VERSUS Asha Kumari & Anr.
Sandeep Jain vs. Mrs. Nivedita Jain
Law laid down - Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act- 1.In determining the amount of maintenance income/financial position of the wife’s parents or other relations is immaterial. 2. Merely because the wife is well qualified, no presumption can be drawn that:- (i) she is in a position to maintain herself. (ii) she is out of employment on her own volition (iii) If she is not in a job it is due to her inaction 3. No set formula can be laid for fixing the amount Full Judgment
ASHISH BHARTI Vs. MEETA SACHDEV
Referred Cases 1, Shri Bharat Hegde Vs. Smt.Saroj Hegde Full Judgment
Alok Sharma Vs. Smt. Nisha Chaubey
PRATEEK GUPTA VERSUS SHILPI GUPTA & ORS
Referred Cases 1, Surya Vadanan vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. 2, DHANWANTI JOSHI Vs. MADHAV UNDE 3, Mrs. Shilpa Aggarwal Vs. Mr. Aviral Mittal & Anr. 4, MRS. ELIZABETH DINSHAW Vs.ARVAND M. DINSHAW AND ANR. 5, SYED SALEEMUDDIN Vs. DR.RUKHSANA & ORS 6, Arathi Bandi VERSUS Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao & Ors Full Judgment
AJAY DEY VS SMTI. SANDHYA DAS (DEY)
SMTI RUPAM KUMARI SHAH VS SRI AMIT SHAH
Santhini Versus Vijaya Venketesh
Referred Cases 1, KRISHNA VENI NAGAM Vs. HARISH NIGAM 2, K.A. Abdul Jaleel vs T.A. Shahida 3, SHAMIMA FAROOQUI Vs. SHAHID KHAN 4, MAUSAMI MOITRA GANGULI VERSUS JAYANT GANGULI 5, ROSY JACOB Vs.JACOB A. CHAKRAMAKKAL 6, Vikram Vir Vohra Versus Shalini Bhalla 7, The State Of Maharashtra vs Dr. Praful B. Desai 8, Malthesh Gudda Pooja Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors 9, Budhadev Karmaskar versus State of West Bengal 10, MACKINNON MACKENZIE & CO. LTD Vs. AUDREY D’COSTA & ANR 11, Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors 12, Arun Kumar Agrawal Full Judgment