Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 40229
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 12, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1154
of 2018, Judgment Date: Aug 10, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 454
of 2020, Judgment Date: Aug 10, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 28
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 3422
of 2020, Judgment Date: Aug 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 348
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Patna High Court (Single Judge)
Criminal Miscellaneous, 31745
of 2020, Judgment Date: Aug 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1677
of 2011, Judgment Date: Aug 04, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 32, 119
of 2011, Judgment Date: Aug 04, 2021
Law laid down -
(1) Prosecutrix in a rape case – conviction can be based only on the basis of solitary evidence of prosecutrix but such witness should be of “sterling quality”. Citation relied upon - Krishna Kumar Malik Vs. State of Haryana [(2011) 7 SCC 130] & Rai Sandeep @ Deepu Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2012) 8 SCC 21]. (2) While deciding rape case, the Court must also evaluate the impact of such insinuation on a person Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1575
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 29708
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2021
Law laid down -
1. It is held that, in majority of the cases of rape, the defence of the accused is that the prosecutrix was a consenting party and in most of the cases the accused gets the benefit of doubt also, but in the considered opinion of this Court, barring some exceptions, India are a conservative society, it has not yet reached such level (advance or lower) of civilization where unmarried girls, regardless of their religion, indulge in carnal Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 2322
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 285
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 31, 2021
Law laid down -
(1) Dying Declaration recorded by Doctor – The wife of appellant was burnt 100% and she was conscious and oriented but her condition was grim. It was natural for Doctor to undertake the task of recording dying declaration himself in view of precarious condition..... Para 26 Citation relied upon – Abdul Majid Abdul Rehman, AIR 1976 SC 1782.
(2) Appellant's subsequent conduct relevant under Section 8 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Para 30. Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 112
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 30, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MISC. CRL, 32592
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 30, 2021
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPCR->WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL [ OTHER MATTER ], 256
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 30, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.REV.P., 82
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 28, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 146
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 28, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CRRFC, 8
of 2019, Judgment Date: Jul 28, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 2702
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jul 27, 2021
Full Judgment
