Judgments - Corruption
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
P. SOMARAJU VERSUS STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
S.K. JAIN Versus UNION OF INDIA
Tags Corruption
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MINI VERSUS CBI/SPE COCHIN
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
A. KARUNANITHI VERSUS THE STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
PARITALA SUDHAKAR VERSUS STATE OF TELANGANA
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR VERSUS BRIJ BHUSHAN
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
STATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION CHENNAI CITY-I DEPARTMENT VERSUS G. EASWARAN
Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench- Five Judge)
Sita Soren Versus Union of India
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
ANOOP BARTARIA VERSUS DY. DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE
Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench- Five Judge)
NEERAJ DUTTA VS. STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI)
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT versus PADMANABHAN KISHORE
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
STATE BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VERSUS R. SOUNDIRARASU ETC.
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Vimla Devi Shrivastava W/O Late Haripd Versus The State Of M.P.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SHIV KUMAR SHARMA VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
S.K. TONGIA VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
JARNAIL SINGH & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
S.P. VELUMANI VERSUS ARAPPOR IYAKKAM AND ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
K. SHANTHAMMA v. THE STATE OF TELANGANA
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
State of M.P. and others Vs. Ku. Preeti Patidar and others
Law laid down - S.89 and 92 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993: An amount cannot be directly recovered under Section 92 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam unless the same is determined under Section 89 of the same. This is for the reason that without determining the amount, if the notice under Section 92 is served on a person, the amount cannot be said to be due on the date of its recovery because Full Judgment
Tags Corruption
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)