Judgments - PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988
Mukesh Srivastava Vs C.B.I., S.T.F.
CHAITANYA PRAKASH AUDICHYA Vs. CBI
It is further well established that where misconduct is proved, the alleged enmity between the complainant and the delinquent officer is immaterial. (See B. Hanumantha Rao v. State of A.P.[4]). Full Judgment
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Vs. CHAUDHARI RAN BEER SINGH AND ANR.
K.L BAKOLIA Vs. STATE TH. DIRECTOR,C.B.I.
For coming to the finding of guilt for the offence under Section 13(1)(d) of the Act, firstly, there must be a demand and secondly, there must be acceptance in the sense that the accused received illegal gratification. Full Judgment
Dilip Kumar Diwan Vs State of chhattisgarh
SELVI J. JAYALALITHA Vs STATE, BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION SPECIAL INVESTIGATION CELL CHENNAI
STATE OF A.P. Vs. P.VENKATESHWARLU
The demand and acceptance of the amount as illegal gratification is a sine qua non for constituting an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The prosecution is duty bound to establish that there was illegal offer of bribe and acceptance thereof and it has to be founded on facts. The offence under Section 7 of P.C. Act has been confirmed by the Full Judgment
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs. KESAVAPATNAM CHINA SWAMY
M/S Hcl Infosystem Ltd. Vs. C.B.I.
K. ANBAZHAGAN Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS
We are called upon in this appeal to decide whether the 4th respondent was authorised to represent the case of the prosecution in the High Court of Karnataka in the appeals filed by the accused persons against their conviction by the Special Court, and if he was not so authorised, whether Full Judgment
KEDARI LAL Vs. STATE OF MP
The expression "known sources of income" in Section 13(1) (e) of the Act has two elements, first the income must be received from a lawful source and secondly the receipt of such income must have been intimated in accordance with the provisions of law, rules or orders for the time being applicable to the public servant. The categories so enumerated are illustrative. Receipt by way of share Full Judgment
Ramesh Handa Vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
SUDERSHAN KUMAR Vs. STATE OF H.P.
STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE Vs. A.ARUN KUMAR & ANR.
STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. LABH SINGH
S.DINESH KUMAR Vs. STATE TR.INSPECTOR & ANR
Non-Reportable Full Judgment