Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3166
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 23, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2099
of 2008, Judgment Date: Feb 23, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3094
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 22, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2633
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 22, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1587-1636
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3047
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3049
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3055
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3007-3008
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 20, 2017
Singular question involved in the matter is executability of decree
for permanent injunction against the legal representatives of judgment-
debtor.
It is crystal clear from a perusal of section 50(2) CPC that a decree
for permanent injunction can be executed against the judgment debtor or his
legal representatives.
Normally personal action dies with person but this principle has
application to limited kinds of causes of actions.
In our considered opinion the Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3048
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 20, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3057
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 20, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1398-1399
of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 17, 2017
Whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean
occupation by a member of the family, in this case, the son, is the short
question arising for consideration.
The
premises sought to be evicted is not held for the benefit of the son alone;
but the whole family. It is for the own occupation of the landlord. It has
been established in the facts of this case that the landlord was not happy
and Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8040
of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 17, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1595
of 2007, Judgment Date: Feb 15, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4507
of 2004, Judgment Date: Feb 15, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11337
of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 15, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3420-3421
of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2828
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2565-2566
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3580
of 2006, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017
Full Judgment
