Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF KOLKATA AND ORS. VERSUS APL (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 3910 of 2013, Judgment Date: Feb 21, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags: Eviction

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Mahesh Dube Versus Shivbodh and Ors.

Appeal (Crl.), 1104 of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 12, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags: Eviction Tenancy Decree

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Deepak Tandon & Anr. VERSUS Rajesh Kumar Gupta

Appeal (Civil), 1537­-1538 of 2019, Judgment Date: Feb 07, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags: Eviction Tenancy

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
Rakesh Kumar Vs. Smt. Vidhyawati Sharma

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227, 102 of 2019, Judgment Date: Jan 24, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags: Eviction Tenancy

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
THE ARORA CO OPERATIVE URBAN THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD Vs. NAMITA YADAV

RC.REV., 591 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 14, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags: Eviction Tenancy

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
OM PRAKASH AND ANR. Vs. MISHRI LAL (DEAD) REP. BY HIS LR. SAVITRI DEVI

Appeal (Civil), 4309 of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017

That a tenant during the continuance of the tenancy is debarred on the doctrine of estoppel from denying the title of his landlord through whom he claims tenancy, as is enshrined in Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is so well-settled a legal postulation that no decision need be cited to further consolidate the same. Full Judgment

Tags: Eviction Tenancy

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
JAYANTILAL CHIMANLAL PATEL Vs. VADILAL PURSHOTTAMDAS PATEL

Appeal (Civil), 3057 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 20, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags: Eviction

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MEHMOODA GULSHAN Vs. JAVAID HUSSAIN MUNGLOO

Appeal (Civil), 1398-1399 of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 17, 2017

Whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean occupation by a member of the family, in this case, the son, is the short question arising for consideration. The premises sought to be evicted is not held for the benefit of the son alone; but the whole family. It is for the own occupation of the landlord. It has been established in the facts of this case that the landlord was not happy and Full Judgment

Tags: Decree Eviction Tenancy

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
NIDHI Vs. RAM KRIPAL SHARMA (D) THR. LRS.

Appeal (Civil), 1008 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 07, 2017

The point falling for consideration is whether the marriage of the appellant/landlady as subsequent event can extinguish the bona fide requirement of a landlady and disentitle her for the relief sought in the release application filed prior to her marriage. In the facts of present case, the change in subsequent events is not such that would deprive the appellant of her Full Judgment

Tags: Eviction Recovery Of Possession

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
BABURAO Vs. POKHARDAS(D) TR.LRS.

Appeal (Civil), 2606 of 2013, Judgment Date: Aug 16, 2016

Full Judgment

Tags: Eviction

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
RAMESH CHANDRA BHANDARI Vs. RAM SINGH SALAL

Appeal (Civil), 575 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 18, 2016

Full Judgment

Tags: Decree Eviction

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SHYAM LAL Vs. DEEPA DASS CHELA RAM CHELA GARIB DASS

Appeal (Civil), 4245 of 2012, Judgment Date: Feb 27, 2015

The question that arises for consideration is as to whether the plaintiff-appellant became a trespasser after expiry of the lease period or continued to be a tenant having protection for eviction under the tenancy laws. Taking into consideration the various tenancy laws applicable in the State of Punjab and the law discussed by this Court and the High Court, in our considered opinion the trial court, the appellate court Full Judgment

Tags: CPC Eviction Injunction Tenancy