Judgments - Eviction
THE ARORA CO OPERATIVE URBAN THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD Vs. NAMITA YADAV
OM PRAKASH AND ANR. Vs. MISHRI LAL (DEAD) REP. BY HIS LR. SAVITRI DEVI
That a tenant during the continuance of the tenancy is debarred on the doctrine of estoppel from denying the title of his landlord through whom he claims tenancy, as is enshrined in Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is so well-settled a legal postulation that no decision need be cited to further consolidate the same. Full Judgment
JAYANTILAL CHIMANLAL PATEL Vs. VADILAL PURSHOTTAMDAS PATEL
MEHMOODA GULSHAN Vs. JAVAID HUSSAIN MUNGLOO
Whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean occupation by a member of the family, in this case, the son, is the short question arising for consideration. The premises sought to be evicted is not held for the benefit of the son alone; but the whole family. It is for the own occupation of the landlord. It has been established in the facts of this case that the landlord was not happy and Full Judgment
NIDHI Vs. RAM KRIPAL SHARMA (D) THR. LRS.
The point falling for consideration is whether the marriage of the appellant/landlady as subsequent event can extinguish the bona fide requirement of a landlady and disentitle her for the relief sought in the release application filed prior to her marriage. In the facts of present case, the change in subsequent events is not such that would deprive the appellant of her Full Judgment
BABURAO Vs. POKHARDAS(D) TR.LRS.
RAMESH CHANDRA BHANDARI Vs. RAM SINGH SALAL
SHYAM LAL Vs. DEEPA DASS CHELA RAM CHELA GARIB DASS
The question that arises for consideration is as to whether the plaintiff-appellant became a trespasser after expiry of the lease period or continued to be a tenant having protection for eviction under the tenancy laws. Taking into consideration the various tenancy laws applicable in the State of Punjab and the law discussed by this Court and the High Court, in our considered opinion the trial court, the appellate court Full Judgment