Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Dr. (Smt.) Amita Gupta Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Law laid down - Section 10A & 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and Medical Council of India, Minimum Qualifications for Teachers in Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998 – Scope – The provision relating to “establishment” of medical college and recognition of a course” are two distinct and different provisions which are dealt with by different statutory provisions and method. Section 11(2) r/w Notification and corrigendum – A conjoint reading of Section 11(2), original Notification of 1.4.2019 and corrigendum leaves no Full Judgment
Smt. Munni Bai Vs. State of MP and ors.
Sitaram Vs. State of M.P.
Vatash Sharma Vs. Indore Development Authority & another
Law laid down - 1. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Madhya Pradesh Vikas Pradhikarano Ki Sampatiyon Ka Prabandhan Tatha Vyayan Niyam, 2018 - Vyayan Niyam prescribes the method for disposal of the property of Development Authority. The IDA issued NIT for third and fourth time respectively. After cancelling the bid of petitioners, the new NIT was issued based on the fact that after end of Corona curfew, the market value of shops is enormously enhanced. This is not the factor Full Judgment
Vinoda, Son of Baburam Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
M/s Narmada Ginning and Pressing Factory, Harda Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Veer Singh and four others Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Morari vs. State of MP
Arun Kumar Dey v/s The State of Madhya Pradesh through Special Police Establishment
Law laid down - 1. Section 311 of the Cr.P.C – The Section is in two parts. In the first part, the word “may” is employed whereas second part uses “shall”. Thus, first part gives pure discretion to the criminal court whereas second part makes it mandatory to summon the witness. Second part of Section 311 of the Cr.P.C - The litmus test to exercise power under the second part aforesaid is whether it is essential to the just decision of a Full Judgment
Tarun Kumar Mishra Versus State of M.P. & Ors.
Law laid down - As per the provisions of Rule 14 of MP Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966, the disciplinary authority has to apply its mind separately at two different stages, (i) initiation of proceeding and (ii) approval of charge-sheet. It is not enough that if the disciplinary authority has formed an opinion to initiate the disciplinary proceeding and signed it, but for issuance of charge-sheet it would not be required to sign it by the disciplinary authority. Full Judgment
Vir Singh & Ors. Vs. State of M.P.
Ramcharan & Ors. Vs. State of M.P.
State of M.P. Vs. Ramcharan & Ors.
In Reference The State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Pankaj Mishra
Law laid down:- 1. Bar and Bench share common platform for the cause of justice. All other professions are guided by the spirit of Service and Integrity but this profession beside this spirit, also Primes Compassion, Mercy and above all Empathy. Therefore, this profession (Bar and Bench) like medical profession has distinction to heal and role of both the professions is not confined to Serve only, like other professions but their role go much beyond. 2. Relationship of Bar of Bench discussed. Full Judgment