Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Kuldeep Singh Rajawat Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
The State of M. P. vs. Sanjay
Law laid down - Where the minimum sentence is less than 10 years but the maximum sentence is not death or life imprisonment then Section 167 (2) (a) (ii) will apply and the accused will be entitled to grant of “default bail” after 60 days in case charge-sheet is not filed. In view of the same, since the maximum sentence provided u/s.467 of IPC is life imprisonment, regardless that the minimum sentence is less then 10 years, the period of filing Full Judgment
Ashok Singh S/o Raghuveer Singh Yadav Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Community Action Through Motivation Program (CAMP) Versus State of M.P. and others
Hirdayshay Vs. Nutanbai
Law laid down - Held : 1. The husband and wife lived together only for about two years intermittently, since February, 1988 and thereafter, the husband had to either serve the notice or to take the recourse of issuance of search warrant through S.D.M. Despite making persistent efforts to persuade wife to return, she did not join the company of husband and she filed two cases against the husband, both resulted in dismissal. Thus, the intention of wife is clear i.e to Full Judgment
Anil Kumar Kanojia Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - 1.Evidence of a witness examined in other trial can be relied and used only when exigencies provided under Section 299 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are fulfilled i.e. if it is proved that witness had absconded or died or there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, without an amount of delay, expense or inconvenience which, under the circumstances of the case, would be unreasonable. 2.If the eventualities mentioned in Section 299(1) of the Code of Criminal Full Judgment
Shivram Singh Rajawat Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Manager (ER) & others Versus Smt. Preeti Singh
RITA GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Hardik Shah v/s Union of India & Another
Nafees Khan and another Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
M/S Sar Parivahan Pvt. Ltd. vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd.
Law laid down - 9. Word "dispose off" has been described in Oxford English Dictionary as "to throw away or sell, to get rid of substance that you do not want." In legal sense word "dispose" means that final order has been passed in a case. Word "dispose" is different from word "dismiss" which means "to reject a case". If a case is disposed off then it means it is either allowed or rejected or partly allowed but final order has Full Judgment
Aman Bachat Mahila Swa Sahaiyata Samuh Rahatgarh & ors Vs. The State of M.P & ors
Himadri Pal Vs. Rajeev Rawat and another
M.L. Mittal Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & another
Law laid down - Mere pendency of an appeal against the acquittal order of an employee does not confer any right upon the respondent/employer to withhold the retiral dues of the employee. Full Judgment
Balaji Chemist Vs. Indian Red Cross Society & The General Secretary
Smt. Nirmala Devi vs. Anil Kumar Tiwari
Law laid down - Held: Section 5 (i) and Section 11 of the Act of 1955, makes it clear that if either party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage and if such marriage is solemnized after commencement of the Act of 1955, the same is void ipso-jure. The fact that whether the other party had the knowledge of existing spouse living at the time of marriage is immaterial Section 11 of the Act of 1955 only prescribes marriages Full Judgment
Akram S/o Amanat Khan & Fazal S/o Taki Khan Vs. State of M.P.
Law Laid Down - Chance Witness- Interested witnessEvidentiary value - (i) If presence of witness is satisfactorily established, his statement cannot be discarded by treating him as mere “chance witness”. The expression ‘chance witnesses’ is borrowed from countries where every man’s home is considered his castle and every one must have an explanation for his presence elsewhere or in another man’s castle. It is a most unsuitable expression in a country whose people are less formal and more casual. (Judgment of Supreme Full Judgment