Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Pratham National Security vs. Union of India & Others
Gangaram Prajapati vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Law laid down - 1. The order of preventive detention for its sustainability needs to satisfy compliance of the procedural mandate of Section 3(3) of Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 obliging the District Magistrate, who passes the order of preventive detention to forthwith report to the State Government. 2. The expression “forthwith” used in Section 3(3) of Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 means immediately without any unnecessary unexplained Full Judgment
Deenbandhu Saket Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others.
Law laid down - The delinquent employee in a disciplinary proceeding has a statutory right under Rule 18(4) of M.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966, to engage a Defence Assistant for which the Disciplinary Authority/Inquiry Officer ought to assist the delinquent employee so that the requirement of reasonable opportunity of being heard is satisfied. Full Judgment
Kuldeep Singh Rajawat Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
The State of M. P. vs. Sanjay
Law laid down - Where the minimum sentence is less than 10 years but the maximum sentence is not death or life imprisonment then Section 167 (2) (a) (ii) will apply and the accused will be entitled to grant of “default bail” after 60 days in case charge-sheet is not filed. In view of the same, since the maximum sentence provided u/s.467 of IPC is life imprisonment, regardless that the minimum sentence is less then 10 years, the period of filing Full Judgment
Ashok Singh S/o Raghuveer Singh Yadav Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Community Action Through Motivation Program (CAMP) Versus State of M.P. and others
Hirdayshay Vs. Nutanbai
Law laid down - Held : 1. The husband and wife lived together only for about two years intermittently, since February, 1988 and thereafter, the husband had to either serve the notice or to take the recourse of issuance of search warrant through S.D.M. Despite making persistent efforts to persuade wife to return, she did not join the company of husband and she filed two cases against the husband, both resulted in dismissal. Thus, the intention of wife is clear i.e to Full Judgment
Anil Kumar Kanojia Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - 1.Evidence of a witness examined in other trial can be relied and used only when exigencies provided under Section 299 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are fulfilled i.e. if it is proved that witness had absconded or died or there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, without an amount of delay, expense or inconvenience which, under the circumstances of the case, would be unreasonable. 2.If the eventualities mentioned in Section 299(1) of the Code of Criminal Full Judgment
Shivram Singh Rajawat Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Manager (ER) & others Versus Smt. Preeti Singh
RITA GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Hardik Shah v/s Union of India & Another
Nafees Khan and another Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
M/S Sar Parivahan Pvt. Ltd. vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd.
Law laid down - 9. Word "dispose off" has been described in Oxford English Dictionary as "to throw away or sell, to get rid of substance that you do not want." In legal sense word "dispose" means that final order has been passed in a case. Word "dispose" is different from word "dismiss" which means "to reject a case". If a case is disposed off then it means it is either allowed or rejected or partly allowed but final order has Full Judgment
Aman Bachat Mahila Swa Sahaiyata Samuh Rahatgarh & ors Vs. The State of M.P & ors
Himadri Pal Vs. Rajeev Rawat and another
M.L. Mittal Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & another
Law laid down - Mere pendency of an appeal against the acquittal order of an employee does not confer any right upon the respondent/employer to withhold the retiral dues of the employee. Full Judgment