Judgments - Supreme Court of India
SRI MAIREMBAM PRITHVIRAJ @ PRITHIBIRAJ SINGH Vs. SHRI PUKHREM SHARATCHANDRA SINGH
SHYAM PAL Vs. DAYAWATI BESOYA AND ANR.
COMMR.COMMERCIAL TAX U.P. Vs. M/S OSWAL GREENTECH LIMITED
COMMR.OF COMMERCIAL TAX & ORS. Vs. M/S BAJAJ AUTO LTD.& ANR
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. NAFE SINGH AND ORS
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. AMAN AND ORS
T.S.DAS & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
NAVJOT SINGH SIDHU Vs. OM PRAKASH SONI & ORS
DRAVYA FINANCE PVT.LTD & ANR. Vs. S.K. ROY & ORS
KAIL LTD. FORMERLY KITCHEN APPL.(I) LD. Vs. STATE OF KERALA TR.JT.COMMR.(LAW)
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS Vs. JAGJIT SINGH AND ORS
Having traversed the legal parameters with reference to the application of the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’, in relation to temporary employees (daily-wage employees, ad-hoc appointees, employees appointed on casual basis, contractual employees and the like), the sole factor that requires our determination is, whether the concerned employees (before this Court), were rendering similar duties and responsibilities, as were Full Judgment
M/S. ANJANEY FERRO ALLOYS LTD. VERSUS JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ORS.
SAROJ AGARWALLA(DEAD) THR LR ABHISHEK AGRAWALLA Vs. YASHEEL JAIN
RIHANA Vs. STATE OF U.P AND ORS.
CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INST.&ANR. Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT & ORS.
BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET Vs. CRICKET AASOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS
HET RAM BENIWAL & ORS. Vs. RAGHUVEER SINGH & ORS
It has been held by this Court that judges need not be protected and that they can take care of themselves. It is the right and interest of the public in the due administration of justice that have to be protected. See Asharam M. Jain v. A. T. Gupta, reported in (1983) 4 SCC 125. Vilification of judges would lead to the destruction of the system of administration of justice. The statements made by the Full Judgment