Judgments - Supreme Court of India
TIN PLATE DEALERS ASSN. P. LTD. & ORS. Vs. SATISH CHANDRA SANWALKA & ORS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Vs. M/S MEGHMANI ORGANICS LTD.& ORS
SALAM SAMARJEET SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL AND ANR
In my considered view the Rules and the instructions clearly demonstrate that there was no cut-off mark or pass mark for the viva voce examination in the past and therefore the High Court on 12.01.2015 made a specific Resolution that no one shall be declared passed and selected for appointment unless he secures minimum 40% in the Full Judgment
ASIKALI AKBARALI GILANI ETC Vs. NASIRHUSAIN MAHEBUBBHAI CHAUHAN & ORS
THE MADURAI CORPORATION Vs. P. KAYALVIZHI & ANR
ANIL HOBLE Vs. KASHINATH JAIRAM SHETYE AND ORS
KAMTA YADAV & ORS. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
NARENDRA Vs. K.MEENA
Fortunately for the Appellant, because of the noise and disturbance, even the neighbours of the Appellant rushed to help and the door of the bathroom was broken open and the Respondent was saved. Had she been successful in her attempt to commit suicide, then one can foresee the consequences and the plight of the Appellant because in that event the Appellant would have Full Judgment
M/S DUGAR TEA INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD. Vs. STATE OF ASSAM & ORS
HIRAL P. HARSORA AND ORS. Vs. KUSUM NAROTTAMDAS HARSORA AND ORS
GOV.BODY,L.P SHAHI COLLEGE, PATNA & ANR Vs. SEEMA MISHRA AND ORS
ANURAG KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.
It is significant that the Rules refer to the recruitment year. It is a well-accepted principle of service law that only the number of vacancies that are advertised can be filled up. If the advertisement gives liberty to the Government to vary the number of posts, such power cannot be exercised for filling up future vacancies. If additional posts were created during the recruitment year i.e. Full Judgment
LALJIBHAI KADVABHAI SAVALIYA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS
BHAGWAN JAGANNATH MARKAD & ORS. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
A. AYYASAMY Vs. A. PARAMASIVAM & ORS
RAJA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
SYEDA RAHIMUNNISA Vs. MALAN BI (DEAD) BY LRS. & ANR.ETC.
JOSE @ PAPPACHAN Vs. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOYILANDY & ANR
In Dhan Raj @ Dhand vs. State of Haryana (2014) 6 SCC 745, one of us (Hon. Ghose,J.) while dwelling on the imperatives of circumstantial evidence ruled that the same has to be of highest order to satisfy the test of proof in a criminal prosecution. It was underlined that such circumstantial evidence should establish a complete unbroken Full Judgment