Judgments - Supreme Court of India
TEKAN ALIAS TEKRAM Vs. STATE OF M.P (NOW CHHATTISGARH)
MUKUND DEWANGAN Vs. ORIENTAL INS.CO.LTD.
PAMPATI SATHAMMA (D) TH. LRS. Vs. PAMPAT GANGARAM
HAMANT YASHWANT DHAGE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS
BHARAMAPPA GOGI Vs. PRAVEEN MURTHY & ORS. ETC.
RICHA MISHRA Vs. STATE OF CHHATISGARH & ORS.
SURJEET SINGH BHAMRA Vs. BANK OF INDIA & ORS.
DEEPAK SURANA AND ORS Vs. STATE OF M.P
The agreements in question were not even recovered from the custody of the appellants and were recovered from the vendors themselves. The agreements being unilateral and not bearing the signatures of the appellants, mere execution of such agreements cannot be considered as a relevant circumstance against the appellants. There is nothing on record to indicate that the consideration mentioned in the agreement could be traced Full Judgment
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS VS Vs.
SURESH NARAYAN KADAM & ORS. Vs. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS.
M/S. V.L.S. FINANCE LTD. Vs. S.P. GUPTA AND ANR
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. Vs. ANAND ARYA AND ORS
RAM SARAN VARSHNEY & ORS Vs. STATE OF U.P.& ANR
S.N. BHARDWAJ Vs. ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA & ORS.
JAYA BISWAL & ORS. Vs. BRANCH MANAGER, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR.
NARAYANRAO JAGOBAJI GAWANDE PUB.TRUST Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
KERALA PUB.SERVICE COMMN.& ORS. Vs. STATE INFORMATION COMMN.& ANR
C.B.I.,BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELL Vs. RAMESH GELLI & OR
While there can be no manner of doubt that in the Objects and Reasons stated for enactment of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 it has been made more than clear that the Act, inter alia, envisages widening of the scope of the definition of public servant, nevertheless, the mere performance of public duties by the holder of any office cannot bring the incumbent Full Judgment