Judgments - Supreme Court of India
THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, DEOGHAT JHALWA ALLAHABAD AND ANR Vs. DR. ANURIKA VAISH AND ORS. ETC.
V.K. BALASUBRAMANIAN (DEAD) BY LRS. Vs. C. SUMATHI
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. Vs. ANOOP SINGH AND ORS.
PRANAY KUMAR PODDER Vs. STATE OF TRIPURA & OTHERS
MANTI DEVI & ANR. Vs. KISHUN SAH @ KISHUN DEO SAO & ORS.
DINSHAW RUSI MEHTA AND ANR. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASTRA AND ORS.
HAKEEM KHAN & ORS. Vs. STATE OF M.P.
It will be necessary for us to emphasise that a possible view denotes an opinion which can exist or be formed irrespective of the correctness or otherwise of such an opinion. A view taken by a court lower in the hierarchical structure may be termed as erroneous or wrong by a superior court upon a mere disagreement. But such a conclusion of the higher Full Judgment
G N SUBRAMANYA UPADHYAYA Vs. SOUMYA M. HEGDE
MAHARASHTRA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA & ANR. Vs. DILIP GANPATRAO LANJEWAR & ANR.
VED PRAKASH ARYA @ RAMJEE & ANR. Vs. PANNA LAL & ORS
GURBACHAN SINGH Vs. RAVINDER PAUL MOHINDRA & ORS.
BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. MAZDOOR SANGH (BMS) ETC. Vs. BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. ETC
ALI MOHAMMAD BEIGH AND ORS Vs. STATE OF J & K
SAMAJ PARIVARTANA SAMUDAYA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
T.RAVI & ANR Vs. B.CHINNA NARASIMHA & ORS. ETC
OM PRAKASH AND ANR. Vs. MISHRI LAL (DEAD) REP. BY HIS LR. SAVITRI DEVI
That a tenant during the continuance of the tenancy is debarred on the doctrine of estoppel from denying the title of his landlord through whom he claims tenancy, as is enshrined in Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is so well-settled a legal postulation that no decision need be cited to further consolidate the same. Full Judgment
