Judgments - Supreme Court of India
MALATI SARDAR Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
The question for consideration thus is whether the Tribunal at Kolkata had the jurisdiction to decide the claim application under Section 166 of the Act when the accident took place outside Kolkata jurisdiction and the claimant also resided outside Kolkata jurisdiction, but the respondent being a juristic person carried on business at Kolkata. Further question is whether in absence of Full Judgment
SRI AUROBINDO ASHRAM TRUST AND ORS Vs. R RAMANATHAN AND ORS
DAMODAR LAL Vs. SOHAN DEVI AND ORS
KULDEEP KUMAR PATHAK Vs. STATE OF UP AND ORS
JAGDISH PRASAD VERMA(D) BY LRS. & ORS. Vs. STATE OF M.P. & ORS.
VANKA NEERAJA Vs. VEERINA SAI @ SAIRAM
RAMAKANT DWIVEDI Vs. RAFIQ AHMAD AND ORS.
MANGT. OF NARENDRA & CO. PVT. LTD. Vs. WORKMEN OF NARENDRA & CO.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Full Judgment
SAMEERA PAIKARA Vs. AMIT AJIT JOGI( AMIT AISHWARYA JOGI) & ORS.
MOHDINSA NABISA GURIKAR (D) BY LRS Vs. IMAMSA CHANDAS GURIKAR (D) BY LRS & ORS.
M/S. S.K.L. CO. Vs. CHIEF COMMERCIAL OFFICER & ORS.
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Vs. VIRUDHUNAGAR STEEL ROLLING MILLS LTD&ORS
LIC OF INDIA Vs. INSURE POLICY PLUS SERVICES PVT.LTD.&ORS
THE KERALA BAR HOTELS ASSOCIATION & ANR. Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.
PRAMOD Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION P.LTD. Vs. M/S HARYANA CONCAST LIMITED & ANR
K.B. RAMACHANDRA RAJ URS(D) BY LRS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. HEMANT KAWADU CHAURIWAL ETC
It is a settled law that dying declaration can be the sole basis of conviction and it does not require any corroboration. But it is equally true that dying declaration goes against the cardinal principle of law that 'evidence must be direct'. Thus, dying declaration must be judged and appreciated in light of the surrounding circumstances Full Judgment