Judgments - Supreme Court of India
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH Vs. M/S. STESALIT LTD.
Nidhi Kaim and another Vs State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Besides, the consideration recorded by us, in the foregoing paragraphs, we may confess, that we felt persuaded for taking the view that we have, for a very important reason – national character. There is a saying – when wealth is lost, nothing is lost; when health is lost, something is lost; but when character is lost, Full Judgment
Reshma Anil Bhosale Vs Maharashtra State Election Commission & Others
The remedy under Article 136 is a discretionary remedy though it does not mean that the discretion should be exercised whimsically. The elections in question pertain to a local body under a local law of the State Legislature. The result of the election is most unlikely to have any effect on the affairs of this nation. We are even inclined to believe that the result of the election would not have any repercussions Full Judgment
VIVEK SINGH Vs. ROMANI SINGH
KUYADAT ALI AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF U.P AND ORS.
REENA SURESH ALHAT Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ARULMIGU CHOKKANATHASWAMY KOIL TRUST VIRUDHUNAGAR Vs. CHANDRAN & ORS
ASSOCIATION OF VICTIMS OF UPHAAR TRAGEDY Vs. SUSHIL ANSAL AND ANR.
B.K.PAVITRA & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
It is clear from the above discussion that exercise for determining ‘inadequacy of representation’, ‘backwardness’ and ‘overall efficiency’, is a must for exercise of power under Article 16(4A). Mere fact that there is no proportionate representation in promotional posts for the population of SCs and STs is not by itself enough to grant consequential seniority to promotees who are otherwise junior and thereby denying seniority to those who are given Full Judgment
NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
VIJAY KUMAR AHLUWALIA AND ORS Vs. BISHAN CHAND MAHESHWARI AND ANR
It is a settled principle of law that while considering the grant of leave to contest the eviction proceedings under the Rent Laws, the Authority/Court is not expected to examine the merits and demerits of the grounds raised in the application for grant of leave to contest and if the Authority/Court finds that the grounds raised prima facie disclose Full Judgment
NIDHI Vs. RAM KRIPAL SHARMA (D) THR. LRS.
The point falling for consideration is whether the marriage of the appellant/landlady as subsequent event can extinguish the bona fide requirement of a landlady and disentitle her for the relief sought in the release application filed prior to her marriage. In the facts of present case, the change in subsequent events is not such that would deprive the appellant of her Full Judgment
DURGA PRASAD Vs. NARAYAN RAM CHANDAANI (D) THR. LR
MANORANJANA SINH @ GUPTA Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
That detention in custody of under-trial prisoners for an indefinite period would amount to violation of Article 21 of the Constitution was highlighted. Full Judgment